Jump to content


Photo

B210 Rear Suspension conversion


  • Please log in to reply
41 replies to this topic

#1 ColdSaus

ColdSaus

    Newbie

  • New Members
  • Pip
  • 11 posts
  • Location:Hercules, Ca
  • Cars:None yet

Posted 14 May 2017 - 06:00 PM

Hey Ratsun,

 

Iv'e been researching the suspension modifications and assemblies for a datsun b210, and how the rear suspension is set up, it seems like the area where the rear shocks are mounted can house a full coilover assembly. If some of the leaf springs were removed, would the leaf spring assembly still have the stability to keep the rear axle in place? I don't have a B for a reference, so correct me if i'm wrong; but if the leaf springs can't maintain stability, could a brace be used in place of the leaf springs? I'm thinking of a brace similar in design to a shock, but can easily be collapsed and rotates at the point where the axle meets the leaf as well as the point where the end of the leaf spring connects.

 

As always, thanks for the help.  



#2 Ranman72

Ranman72

    Datsun Mechanic

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,833 posts
  • Location:Citrus Heights
  • Cars:68 datsun 510 2 door / 69 Datsun Roadster /05 350z / 08 f350 / 73 datsun 1200 coupe

Posted 14 May 2017 - 06:26 PM

you have to triangulate the rear end in a way that in can move up and down but still be stable 

for reference look up 4 link designs

 as an option one leaf might keep it stable with coil over shocks for strength  but havent heard of anyone doing this 

also need to make sure the shock mount area is strong enough to support the cars weight 



#3 Lockleaf

Lockleaf

    Hall Monitor

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,530 posts
  • Location:Happy Valley, Utah
  • Cars:'71 510 Goon, '90 240SX, '85 720, '69 Roadster, '96 Pathfinder, too much other shite

Posted 14 May 2017 - 08:51 PM

1st gen camaros came with a factory option that was one leaf in the spring and a set of air shocks. If GM was comfortable with that idea from the factory, i would be willing to do it with coilovers.

But yes, mount location strength still needs to be checked.

Half Pint ('71 510 Goon) http://community.rat...agon/p?=1269361

 

Audrey ('69 Roadster 1600) http://community.rat...rey-the-ratster

 

Tiny Havok ('85 720 DIY built Crewcab 4x4) http://community.rat...ache/?p=1395455

 

720 Shenanigans http://community.rat...20-shenanigans/


#4 bananahamuck

bananahamuck

    S&S chicken/rice

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,540 posts
  • Location:Tumwater WA
  • Cars:Cleopatra does the nasty.

Posted 14 May 2017 - 10:35 PM

1st gen camaros came with a factory option that was one leaf in the spring and a set of air shocks. If GM was comfortable with that idea from the factory, i would be willing to do it with coilovers.

But yes, mount location strength still needs to be checked.

 

 

But those camaros also have a rod coming from the bottom of axle up to the body cuz without them they hop like a rabbit ,, well,, even with them actually .. . And if i remember right ,  the shocks are staggered front and back .. Most people that drove the shit outta them also retro fitted a panhard bar too.

 

I didn't have camaro i had 67 firebird with a 455 installed but same difference . But my memory fades so ,,,,

 

 

.

 

 

 

.


So somehow while i was driving back from Eaglerock swap meet i somehow caused YOU to post this,,,, do really think members on this site are that stupid to believe i caused it??

http://community.rat...un-for-a-while/

Yeah i guess you do,,

 

BTW ,,,, the first person to call you a pussy,,,, ya might wanna check out his ethnicity ,, cuz i don't think it's what you think it is there snowflakeboy

 


..........................I shall call it, narclops.

 

 

 


#5 datzenmike

datzenmike

    KING RAT

  • User Administrator
  • 71,787 posts
  • Location:Vancouver Island
  • Cars:'74 710 sedan, '76 710. prevoius... '78 620, '71 521, '68 510 new '76 B-210

Posted 15 May 2017 - 04:39 AM

What's wrong with the leaf spring set up??? I had a new '76 B-210 and it worked just fine.


Posted Image

#6 datsunfreak

datsunfreak

    Senior Member

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,682 posts
  • Location:Arlington, TX
  • Cars:'73 1200 Coupe, '77 280Z

Posted 15 May 2017 - 02:41 PM

 as an option one leaf might keep it stable with coil over shocks for strength  but havent heard of anyone doing this 

 

I've done this. Worked well for me. Your mileage may vary.

 

I've also seen others do this to more easily install air bags. The one leaf will be soft enough that it will squat all the way down, but are stiff enough torsionally to keep the geometry correct. 


It's your car, just don't ruin it.


This seems like an elaborate ploy to get me to say "I like the D".


#7 datsunfreak

datsunfreak

    Senior Member

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,682 posts
  • Location:Arlington, TX
  • Cars:'73 1200 Coupe, '77 280Z

Posted 15 May 2017 - 02:43 PM

Also sedan (trunk) or coupe (hatchback)? It will be relatively simple on a sedan. It gets a good bit more complex on a coupe, bordering on impossible. 


It's your car, just don't ruin it.


This seems like an elaborate ploy to get me to say "I like the D".


#8 MikeRL411

MikeRL411

    78 'n counting...

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,482 posts
  • Location:Rancho Palos Verdes CA
  • Cars:67RL411, 90 240SX, 97J30T

Posted 15 May 2017 - 05:03 PM

But those camaros also have a rod coming from the bottom of axle up to the body cuz without them they hop like a rabbit ,, well,, even with them actually .. . And if i remember right ,  the shocks are staggered front and back .. Most people that drove the shit outta them also retro fitted a panhard bar too.

 

I didn't have camaro i had 67 firebird with a 455 installed but same difference . But my memory fades so ,,,,

 

 

.

 

 

 

.Panhard rod!



#9 datzenmike

datzenmike

    KING RAT

  • User Administrator
  • 71,787 posts
  • Location:Vancouver Island
  • Cars:'74 710 sedan, '76 710. prevoius... '78 620, '71 521, '68 510 new '76 B-210

Posted 15 May 2017 - 06:05 PM

I'm not seeing why replacing the leaf spring suspension is necessary.

 

A single leaf is a bad way to keep the rear axle centered laterally. Under extreme loading in a corner, the leaf will twist. To make the axle stable you need all the leaves.

 

If looking to lower just get lowering blocks and longer U bolts, what? $30 maybe. Axle is secure, spring rate is the same, no guessing with coils.


Posted Image

#10 datsunfreak

datsunfreak

    Senior Member

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,682 posts
  • Location:Arlington, TX
  • Cars:'73 1200 Coupe, '77 280Z

Posted 16 May 2017 - 12:44 PM

If looking to lower just get lowering blocks and longer U bolts, what? $30 maybe. Axle is secure, spring rate is the same, no guessing with coils.

 

But what if you want the option of trying out different spring rates? This can get very expensive with leaf springs. 

 

Regardless of what all the low junkies will tell you, this is the real reason for coilovers. Spring selection and corner weighting. 


It's your car, just don't ruin it.


This seems like an elaborate ploy to get me to say "I like the D".


#11 DaBlist

DaBlist

    Datsun Mechanic

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,570 posts
  • Location:North Bend Wa
  • Cars:Had 521 & 1200, Now 71 Chevy SWB, 72 BMW, 2010 Tahoe

Posted 16 May 2017 - 12:52 PM

Hey Ratsun,

 

Iv'e been researching the suspension modifications and assemblies for a datsun b210, and how the rear suspension is set up, it seems like the area where the rear shocks are mounted can house a full coilover assembly. If some of the leaf springs were removed, would the leaf spring assembly still have the stability to keep the rear axle in place? I don't have a B for a reference, so correct me if i'm wrong; but if the leaf springs can't maintain stability, could a brace be used in place of the leaf springs? I'm thinking of a brace similar in design to a shock, but can easily be collapsed and rotates at the point where the axle meets the leaf as well as the point where the end of the leaf spring connects.

 

As always, thanks for the help.  

What is the goal? Stance, drag, autocross, offroad


 "It's like comparing a wooden roller coaster to a modern modern roller coaster. Without a doubt the modern roller coaster is faster, quieter and smoother. But people still love to ride the wooden roller coasters. The sounds, vibrations, jerks and jolts all add to the experience. Sure a wooden roller coaster may not be as fast, but it's sure a fun ride that can equally scare the crap out of you." - Annette

 

"is it racist to assume that cauliflower is just white entitled broccoli ?" - jrock

 

"You spend a lot of time pushing on doors that say pull, don't you?" - mhub91

 

Light travels faster than sound, that's why some people appear bright until they speak - www


#12 datzenmike

datzenmike

    KING RAT

  • User Administrator
  • 71,787 posts
  • Location:Vancouver Island
  • Cars:'74 710 sedan, '76 710. prevoius... '78 620, '71 521, '68 510 new '76 B-210

Posted 17 May 2017 - 05:19 AM

Yes, vague post without enough info on the intent. While coil overs are adjustable.... once you get the height where you want it they become expensive dead weight.


Posted Image

#13 datb210sun

datb210sun

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 25 posts
  • Location:Memphiis
  • Cars:75 b210, 91 d21

Posted 31 May 2017 - 11:18 AM

Was gonna start a topic to get different ideas on a rear suspension set up. Guess i'll steal this one. Anyways, can anyone tell me what setup for lowering you use as far as the shocks, blocks, and leaf springs? Thanks in advance.



#14 datsunfreak

datsunfreak

    Senior Member

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,682 posts
  • Location:Arlington, TX
  • Cars:'73 1200 Coupe, '77 280Z

Posted 31 May 2017 - 01:06 PM

Was gonna start a topic to get different ideas on a rear suspension set up. Guess i'll steal this one. Anyways, can anyone tell me what setup for lowering you use as far as the shocks, blocks, and leaf springs? Thanks in advance.

 

Sedan (trunk) or coupe (hatchback)?

 

3" blocks, spring stiffeners, and some KYBs for a total drop of 2.5".


It's your car, just don't ruin it.


This seems like an elaborate ploy to get me to say "I like the D".


#15 datb210sun

datb210sun

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 25 posts
  • Location:Memphiis
  • Cars:75 b210, 91 d21

Posted 31 May 2017 - 01:28 PM

Sedan. but any 3" blocks will do? I really just want to stick with 2" so it won't bottom out or unless that spring stiffener will keep it from bottoming out when using the 3"blocks. I will check out some kyb. Need to see if belltech make some for b210's. Thanks for the info. 



#16 datsunfreak

datsunfreak

    Senior Member

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,682 posts
  • Location:Arlington, TX
  • Cars:'73 1200 Coupe, '77 280Z

Posted 31 May 2017 - 01:37 PM

Sedan.

 

Shocks for an '82-92 Camaro should fit and be 2" shorter. 

 

 

but any 3" blocks will do?

 

Blocks are fairly universal. Shackles are not. 

 

 

unless that spring stiffener will keep it from bottoming out 

 

That's why we use them.   B)

 

 

I really just want to stick with 2" 

 

2" without stiffeners will bottom out. Often. 

 

2" with stiffeners will only get you a 1.5" drop. 

 

In my opinion, 2.5" in the rear is perfect for a B210 sedan. 


It's your car, just don't ruin it.


This seems like an elaborate ploy to get me to say "I like the D".


#17 datsunfreak

datsunfreak

    Senior Member

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,682 posts
  • Location:Arlington, TX
  • Cars:'73 1200 Coupe, '77 280Z

Posted 31 May 2017 - 01:41 PM

2.5" rear, 3" front.

 

 

 

On 14s

428bf4993c962f84b96edc8626686ade.jpg

 

 

On 15s

datsun-210-1975-8.jpg


It's your car, just don't ruin it.


This seems like an elaborate ploy to get me to say "I like the D".


#18 Tom1200

Tom1200

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 177 posts
  • Location:Las Vegas
  • Cars:Datsun 1200 coupe

Posted 31 May 2017 - 08:27 PM

On my 1200 coupe the ride height is adjusted via the rear shackles per the Datsun competition suspension manual. If one were trying to get the corner weights set you could come up with a set of blocks in small increments.

As for the spring rates I'd find out what rates the Nissan Motorsports springs units where and work from there. For a road car I'd focus on not so much the rates but the difference between front and rear. It's been ages since I had my B210 street car but I think I used a Z car spring in front, stock rear springs, ADCO anti-sway bars, Koni wet inserts front and Koni classic rears.

As for lateral location I'd use bushings like the ones in the 1200 suspension manual; it takes R compound tires to put enough force in the springs to get lateral flex and even then most drivers aren't likely to put enough force in them.

Tom

#19 datb210sun

datb210sun

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 25 posts
  • Location:Memphiis
  • Cars:75 b210, 91 d21

Posted 01 June 2017 - 07:29 AM

Shocks for an '82-92 Camaro should fit and be 2" shorter. 

 

 

 

Blocks are fairly universal. Shackles are not. 

 

 

 

That's why we use them.   B)

 

 

 

2" without stiffeners will bottom out. Often. 

 

2" with stiffeners will only get you a 1.5" drop. 

 

In my opinion, 2.5" in the rear is perfect for a B210 sedan. 

Thanks for the info., man. I really appreciate it.



#20 datb210sun

datb210sun

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 25 posts
  • Location:Memphiis
  • Cars:75 b210, 91 d21

Posted 01 June 2017 - 07:36 AM

2.5" rear, 3" front.

 

 

 

On 14s

428bf4993c962f84b96edc8626686ade.jpg

 

 

On 15s

datsun-210-1975-8.jpg

This sitting on 3" kyb shocks and what leaf spring stiffeners you use?