Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Narrowed rear control arms


  • Please log in to reply
81 replies to this topic

#1 Icehouse

Icehouse

    wolf man

  • User Administrator
  • 5,644 posts
  • Location:seattle WA
  • Cars:57 VW SC - 59 210 - 64 VW camper - 2 68 510 2 dr - 70 bluebird coupe - 3 71 510 2 drs - 73 1200 ute

Posted 06 March 2017 - 08:28 PM

Sam and I are going to make some narrowed rear control arms.  We haven't nailed down a design yet, if anyone has any ideas they would like to share we are all ears.  They are going to be 2" narrower per side.  We want to retain the original control arm bushings and bolt pattern for the drum brakes (since even if your car is upgraded to disks the brackets will still work) and use the same stub axle.  We will however be deleting the stock spring perch.  Seems everyone runs coilovers these days.   Things I'm curious about.

 

1. does anyone have the rear bushing part number?  

 

2. Are they even still available from Nissan?  

 

3. I for some reason remember there being two different length inner bearing spacers.  Is that true?

 

 

 

These arms will allow me to run 13x8 +0 rims front and back with 225 45 13's.  Which would be bad ass! 

Posted Image Posted Image

"All men by nature desire knowledge."
Aristotle

#2 thisismatt

thisismatt

    Senior Damon

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,267 posts
  • Location:Santa Barbara, CA
  • Cars:'71 521, '69 521 donor

Posted 06 March 2017 - 08:38 PM

1. 55045-21000

 

IMG_1630__zps45fde0ce.jpg

 

2. Looks like it.

 

3. If you mean inside the hubs, yes, there are actually 3 different lengths, but I can't tell you what they are :P


I'm your huckleberry.

One jump ahead of the lawmen
That's all, and that's no joke
These guys don't appreciate I'm broke

#3 datzenmike

datzenmike

    KING RAT

  • User Administrator
  • 68,772 posts
  • Location:Vancouver Island
  • Cars:'74 710 sedan, '76 710. prevoius... '78 620, '71 521, '68 510 new '76 B-210

Posted 06 March 2017 - 08:38 PM

The bushings at the crossmember are 55045-21000 two per arm. Also used in the 610 sedan.


Posted Image

#4 datzenmike

datzenmike

    KING RAT

  • User Administrator
  • 68,772 posts
  • Location:Vancouver Island
  • Cars:'74 710 sedan, '76 710. prevoius... '78 620, '71 521, '68 510 new '76 B-210

Posted 06 March 2017 - 08:39 PM

damn, too slow.


Posted Image

#5 Ratwagon1600

Ratwagon1600

    ɐıןɐɹʇsnɐ oʇ ǝɯoɔןǝʍ

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,443 posts
  • Location:Gods country.
  • Cars:1600 project, Yota Hilux SR5, Hyundai Santa Fe, 720 ute project.

Posted 06 March 2017 - 09:25 PM

A question Icehouse, is this for a 510?

Hahahaha RW bring called an ass kisser is awesome. Don't know him personally but he always seemed belligerent, not brown nosey.

You have standards?

detective ratwagon


#6 Ratwagon1600

Ratwagon1600

    ɐıןɐɹʇsnɐ oʇ ǝɯoɔןǝʍ

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,443 posts
  • Location:Gods country.
  • Cars:1600 project, Yota Hilux SR5, Hyundai Santa Fe, 720 ute project.

Posted 06 March 2017 - 09:40 PM

A question Icehouse, is this for a 510?


Disregard question, reread and noticed which sub section you posted in.

Narrowing the rear track is the best way to fuck up your rear end steering geometry and invoke understeer in a 510.

Negated albeit with different offset wheels to an extent.

From 20+ years rallying experience with a 510, ive always found they turn in much better with a wider rear track and this is a standard setup trick down here. Originally we used the rear setup out of a 610 SSS (it was wider than factory) which, with a bit of massaging could be made to fit the 510. Subsuquently we would cut and reweld the mounting points to widen the track.

If you go down the route you are, you may find yourself having to do some balancing with both front and rear setup to get the desired handling result. FWIW (taking spring rates and shock absorbers out of the equation) ive always run as wide as possible rear track on my road and race cars. 1/2 degree negative camber on the rear, 1.5 to 2 degrees negative camber on the front and as much positive caster as you can crank out of it.

Additionally, if you do the mods you are talking about, you may also need to fit a rear swaybar to dial out the potential understeer.

Sorry it doesnt answer your original question, just my two cents worth.

Cheers.

Hahahaha RW bring called an ass kisser is awesome. Don't know him personally but he always seemed belligerent, not brown nosey.

You have standards?

detective ratwagon


#7 Trophy24

Trophy24

    Senior Member

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 596 posts
  • Location:Woodinville, WA
  • Cars:1969 2dr 510

Posted 06 March 2017 - 10:29 PM

Hey Jeff since we were talking about this the other day, I confirmed my wheels are 15x8 offset 0. It appears my rear control arms have been modified by the previous owner to allow for more wheel. I have to run a 5 mm spacer for this to work

9E227F2F-5E4C-4FAD-B526-1FB32DCE42FB_zps

7C1346B0-875B-4AFF-97EA-C1DFBBAB87AB_zps

A 195/50r15 is in the wheel now.

#8 Jester

Jester

    Senior Member

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,566 posts
  • Location:Jefferson Oregon
  • Cars:'79 620KC, '93 Pathfinder, '76 GoldWing

Posted 06 March 2017 - 11:02 PM

Eliminating the spring bucket should make for a much easier triangle to build as well.

Be sure to keep us up to date on your ideas. Sounds interesting. 


My King Cab Project SOLD

King Cab #2 Lil Blue

(OO}====={OO)

         

 

Jes


#9 Icehouse

Icehouse

    wolf man

  • User Administrator
  • 5,644 posts
  • Location:seattle WA
  • Cars:57 VW SC - 59 210 - 64 VW camper - 2 68 510 2 dr - 70 bluebird coupe - 3 71 510 2 drs - 73 1200 ute

Posted 07 March 2017 - 10:15 PM

1. 55045-21000

 

IMG_1630__zps45fde0ce.jpg

 

2. Looks like it.

 

3. If you mean inside the hubs, yes, there are actually 3 different lengths, but I can't tell you what they are :P

 

 

Thanks Mat!!  Looks like me may use hiem joints after all.  Luckily I work with Sam so any time an idea pops into one of our heads we can chat about it.  We are going to expand on a design a dude on here posted a long time ago.  

 

 

 

The bushings at the crossmember are 55045-21000 two per arm. Also used in the 610 sedan.

 

 

Crazy you guys both posted at the same time!  

 

damn, too slow.

 

 

by seconds! 

 

Disregard question, reread and noticed which sub section you posted in.

Narrowing the rear track is the best way to fuck up your rear end steering geometry and invoke understeer in a 510.

Negated albeit with different offset wheels to an extent.

From 20+ years rallying experience with a 510, ive always found they turn in much better with a wider rear track and this is a standard setup trick down here. Originally we used the rear setup out of a 610 SSS (it was wider than factory) which, with a bit of massaging could be made to fit the 510. Subsuquently we would cut and reweld the mounting points to widen the track.

If you go down the route you are, you may find yourself having to do some balancing with both front and rear setup to get the desired handling result. FWIW (taking spring rates and shock absorbers out of the equation) ive always run as wide as possible rear track on my road and race cars. 1/2 degree negative camber on the rear, 1.5 to 2 degrees negative camber on the front and as much positive caster as you can crank out of it.

Additionally, if you do the mods you are talking about, you may also need to fit a rear swaybar to dial out the potential understeer.

Sorry it doesnt answer your original question, just my two cents worth.

Cheers.

 

 

 

We are defiantly going to model it in solid works just to see what it does.  What I've learned from the front suspension is its easy misunderstand suspension dynamicallywhen imagining it in my head, so much stuff going on!!  I'll throw in a guess here so I can look back and see how dumb I was.  It seems to me that if we don't change the crossmember pivots and all we do is narrow the rear control arms so 225's will fit under the fenders the roll center will be effected slightly because the previous 195's and the 225's will share the same outer limits.  Without flaring the car I don't see how to avoid this though.  Need more grip at the track :) 

 

P.S.  I don't know if you saw in the swamp thing thread I now own a X rally 510.  Was raced in the early 70's.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hey Jeff since we were talking about this the other day, I confirmed my wheels are 15x8 offset 0. It appears my rear control arms have been modified by the previous owner to allow for more wheel. I have to run a 5 mm spacer for this to work

9E227F2F-5E4C-4FAD-B526-1FB32DCE42FB_zps

7C1346B0-875B-4AFF-97EA-C1DFBBAB87AB_zps

A 195/50r15 is in the wheel now.

 

So thats how the fit!

 

 

 

 

Eliminating the spring bucket should make for a much easier triangle to build as well.

Be sure to keep us up to date on your ideas. Sounds interesting. 

 

 

we will post a preview as soon as we have one.


Posted Image Posted Image

"All men by nature desire knowledge."
Aristotle

#10 q-tip

q-tip

    shark-tip

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,286 posts
  • Location:t-town wa
  • Cars:72 ka'd 4dr 76 620KC

Posted 08 March 2017 - 12:17 PM

I think to truly improve the rear of a 510 it would need a whole redesign not just more narrow arms.

I yeald to the wisdom of Q on this one.

Fuck!!!!!!!! I guess QTip was right...


#11 Icehouse

Icehouse

    wolf man

  • User Administrator
  • 5,644 posts
  • Location:seattle WA
  • Cars:57 VW SC - 59 210 - 64 VW camper - 2 68 510 2 dr - 70 bluebird coupe - 3 71 510 2 drs - 73 1200 ute

Posted 08 March 2017 - 05:27 PM

I think to truly improve the rear of a 510 it would need a whole redesign not just more narrow arms.

 

So your saying we can't improve on the rear suspension at all?  I think a friendly bet may be in order :) 


Posted Image Posted Image

"All men by nature desire knowledge."
Aristotle

#12 q-tip

q-tip

    shark-tip

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,286 posts
  • Location:t-town wa
  • Cars:72 ka'd 4dr 76 620KC

Posted 08 March 2017 - 08:19 PM

It can be done but you're going to end up putting as much into the semi trailing arm as it would take to come up with a superior design to replace it.

I yeald to the wisdom of Q on this one.

Fuck!!!!!!!! I guess QTip was right...


#13 Icehouse

Icehouse

    wolf man

  • User Administrator
  • 5,644 posts
  • Location:seattle WA
  • Cars:57 VW SC - 59 210 - 64 VW camper - 2 68 510 2 dr - 70 bluebird coupe - 3 71 510 2 drs - 73 1200 ute

Posted 08 March 2017 - 09:26 PM

It can be done but you're going to end up putting as much into the semi trailing arm as it would take to come up with a superior design to replace it.

 

 

That's win if we don't have to remove the back seat area.  Which is what would have to do otherwise.  


Posted Image Posted Image

"All men by nature desire knowledge."
Aristotle

#14 q-tip

q-tip

    shark-tip

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,286 posts
  • Location:t-town wa
  • Cars:72 ka'd 4dr 76 620KC

Posted 09 March 2017 - 05:20 AM

That's win if we don't have to remove the back seat area. Which is what would have to do otherwise.


I think it could be done, something the the rear setup from a Miata could be massaged in there without cutting up the seat pan.

I yeald to the wisdom of Q on this one.

Fuck!!!!!!!! I guess QTip was right...


#15 Cmac

Cmac

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 100 posts
  • Location:Sacramento
  • Cars:1971 Datsun 510, 1978 Datsun 620

Posted 10 March 2017 - 10:01 PM

If you are going Fab the rear control arms I would look into using the s13/s14 rear axle bearing. 4 or 5 lug options, 930 cv options and factory set up. The weak link is the stub axle assembly. Looking forward to see what you guys end up making as always.

#16 DISLEXICDIME

DISLEXICDIME

    Brittany

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,735 posts
  • Location:se portland or
  • Cars:71 510 86 720 88 323gtx

Posted 11 March 2017 - 05:28 PM

Miata set up won't work with out loosing the rear seat and moving the fuel tank

#17 Icehouse

Icehouse

    wolf man

  • User Administrator
  • 5,644 posts
  • Location:seattle WA
  • Cars:57 VW SC - 59 210 - 64 VW camper - 2 68 510 2 dr - 70 bluebird coupe - 3 71 510 2 drs - 73 1200 ute

Posted 11 March 2017 - 09:00 PM

If you are going Fab the rear control arms I would look into using the s13/s14 rear axle bearing. 4 or 5 lug options, 930 cv options and factory set up. The weak link is the stub axle assembly. Looking forward to see what you guys end up making as always.

 

 

Yeah our idea would allow to swap bearing carriers.  Hopefully it all works out.  


Posted Image Posted Image

"All men by nature desire knowledge."
Aristotle

#18 q-tip

q-tip

    shark-tip

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,286 posts
  • Location:t-town wa
  • Cars:72 ka'd 4dr 76 620KC

Posted 13 March 2017 - 05:10 AM

Miata set up won't work with out loosing the rear seat and moving the fuel tank


You are correct, I was picturing something more s13 like in my head.

I yeald to the wisdom of Q on this one.

Fuck!!!!!!!! I guess QTip was right...


#19 DISLEXICDIME

DISLEXICDIME

    Brittany

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,735 posts
  • Location:se portland or
  • Cars:71 510 86 720 88 323gtx

Posted 13 March 2017 - 10:34 AM

I was thinking a 323 gtx trapazoid set up would work . But the diff is to small. The rx7 rear end is almost the same . I thought you wanted to try that?

#20 Icehouse

Icehouse

    wolf man

  • User Administrator
  • 5,644 posts
  • Location:seattle WA
  • Cars:57 VW SC - 59 210 - 64 VW camper - 2 68 510 2 dr - 70 bluebird coupe - 3 71 510 2 drs - 73 1200 ute

Posted 13 March 2017 - 04:45 PM

As far as I can tell anything that isn't semi trailing arms is going to require cutting the seat area out.  


Posted Image Posted Image

"All men by nature desire knowledge."
Aristotle