datzenmike Posted August 17, 2017 Report Share Posted August 17, 2017 He thinks he's on Daily Randomness..... 1 Link to comment
KoHeartsGPA Posted August 17, 2017 Report Share Posted August 17, 2017 Ah ok, MAKES SENSE now haha 1 Link to comment
a.d._510_n_ok Posted August 17, 2017 Report Share Posted August 17, 2017 I don't support removing these statues, but we owe it to history to be accurate about what they stood for and why they were fighting their own countrymen. Let's get it straight VTR, they are not just being pulled down on acct of slavery, but for fighting to separate themselves from the Union to maintain their enslaved workforce. They would say it was a state's rights issue versus an overreaching federal government. In the 100 years between our forefather's owning slave and the civil war, the North came to the realization it was wrong and outlawed it. ummmkay.......the Emancipation Proclamtion didn't even outlaw slavery. It just freed the slaves in the states that were in rebellion so any union state where slavery was legal (Maryland, Delaware, Kentucky, Missouri and fifty counties of western Virginia that were loyal to the union and became the separate state of West Virginia) kept their slaves so it freed no one. Not sure how slavery was "outlawed" when it was still being practiced in some union states. 2 Link to comment
RatVonDude Posted August 17, 2017 Report Share Posted August 17, 2017 Daily Trumpyness Sorry, Jus trying to fit in Datsun 3 Link to comment
240zness Posted August 17, 2017 Report Share Posted August 17, 2017 ^ maybe civil war made us all slaves?? Lee fought for the states he was from , even though union wanted him. Few southerners owned slaves , nobody wanted it to stop immediately.. bottom line may have been for laws against slavery, but more to the big picture. I thought more for freedom. Maybe even from the federal bank? Lincolns green backs?? Link to comment
240zness Posted August 17, 2017 Report Share Posted August 17, 2017 Saying the south , KKK are just anti black. Or even the Nazis are just anti Jewish. Is why everyone is hysterical over its reminents in history. No defense of groups conduct , we just may have been sold a story or two Link to comment
125 CSL Posted August 17, 2017 Report Share Posted August 17, 2017 The east coast has just been getting way to much coverage, California just can not take it,.. http://tammybruce.com/2017/08/california-bill-1-year-in-jail-for-refusing-to-use-transgenders-preferred-pronoun.html California Bill: 1 Year in Jail for Refusing to Use Transgender’s Preferred Pronoun 2 Link to comment
racerx Posted August 17, 2017 Report Share Posted August 17, 2017 Oh, yeh civil war was obviously economics. Freed slaves, means nobody picks cotton or tend the Southern plantations. But with all of these current violence, it will not solve issues. Each side is just getting more resolved with their perceived values, specially what happened at Charlottsville. 1 Link to comment
paradime Posted August 17, 2017 Report Share Posted August 17, 2017 They would say it was a state's rights issue versus an overreaching federal government. ummmkay.......the Emancipation Proclamtion didn't even outlaw slavery. It just freed the slaves in the states that were in rebellion so any union state where slavery was legal (Maryland, Delaware, Kentucky, Missouri and fifty counties of western Virginia that were loyal to the union and became the separate state of West Virginia) kept their slaves so it freed no one. Not sure how slavery was "outlawed" when it was still being practiced in some union states. Cicil rights is not a "States issue" it's a Federal United States Constitutional issue. I GENERALIZED where the "North" and "South" divisions stood during the civil, but all the statements you made reenforced that the division was along the very line I stated "fighting to separate themselves from the Union to maintain their enslaved workforce." Now are you going to say the Northern Army was fighting to protect or deny Maryland, Delaware, Kentucky, Missouri and fifty counties of western Virginia's right to slavery, or from becoming the "separate state" of West Virginia, Maryland, Delaware, Kentucky, and Missouri? This argument is moronic at best. Link to comment
datzenmike Posted August 17, 2017 Report Share Posted August 17, 2017 At best, all of Cuz is moronic with a few laughs... Link to comment
paradime Posted August 17, 2017 Report Share Posted August 17, 2017 At best, all of Cuz is moronic with a few laughs... I resemble that remark. :lol: Link to comment
racerx Posted August 17, 2017 Report Share Posted August 17, 2017 Nyuk, nyuk, nyuk...hey Moe. 1 Link to comment
john510 Posted August 17, 2017 Report Share Posted August 17, 2017 I'm still waiting to hear tr8ter's reasoning for assuming ratsun has KKK supporters as members.Is it because some of us are white ? maybe a little tired of Liberalism ? come on man explain ! Link to comment
tr8er Posted August 17, 2017 Report Share Posted August 17, 2017 I'm still waiting to hear tr8ter's reasoning for assuming ratsun has KKK supporters as members.Is it because some of us are white ? maybe a little tired of Liberalism ? come on man explain ! No worries. No one on this thread to my knowledge. 1 Link to comment
RatVonDude Posted August 17, 2017 Report Share Posted August 17, 2017 The east coast has just been getting way to much coverage, California just can not take it,.. http://tammybruce.com/2017/08/california-bill-1-year-in-jail-for-refusing-to-use-transgenders-preferred-pronoun.html California Bill: 1 Year in Jail for Refusing to Use Transgender’s Preferred Pronoun this stuff already exists in Germany, what a bummer to go to jail for freedom of speech, Link to comment
tr8er Posted August 17, 2017 Report Share Posted August 17, 2017 The east coast has just been getting way to much coverage, California just can not take it,.. http://tammybruce.com/2017/08/california-bill-1-year-in-jail-for-refusing-to-use-transgenders-preferred-pronoun.html California Bill: 1 Year in Jail for Refusing to Use Transgender’s Preferred Pronoun So, this bill is only applicable to state employees while on shift a state adult care facility. Essentially if you care for the elderly at a long term care facility (elderly HOME), you should respect those who live there. That is a huge fucking cry from your brief headline. You had me thinking what the fuck, but I decided to actually read the bill that classifies a MISTEMEANOR to state employees for failing to treat seniors like they should be treated in their home. I don't know why they wouldn't just fire their ass, but I've got no problem regulating state employees with state law. This is not really a freedom of speach issue as has been settled in Supreme Court ad nauseum https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201720180SB219 Link to comment
Jesse C. Posted August 17, 2017 Report Share Posted August 17, 2017 No worries. No one on this thread to my knowledge. They are amongst us! 5 Link to comment
paradime Posted August 17, 2017 Report Share Posted August 17, 2017 https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/letters/2017/08/15/clinton-was-right-about-deplorables-now-they-storming-out-basket/4Uac7SNZZozi8AyAix6UiN/story.html?p1=Article_Recommended_ReadMore_Pos1 Batter up!!! 1 Link to comment
240zness Posted August 17, 2017 Report Share Posted August 17, 2017 Deplorables that don't use aliases No worries. No one on this thread to my knowledge. Wheeeew!! 2 Link to comment
RatVonDude Posted August 17, 2017 Report Share Posted August 17, 2017 another terrorist attack, I think the death toll is higher than stated here Link to comment
paradime Posted August 18, 2017 Report Share Posted August 18, 2017 So, this bill is only applicable to state employees while on shift a state adult care facility. Essentially if you care for the elderly at a long term care facility (elderly HOME), you should respect those who live there. That is a huge fucking cry from your brief headline. You had me thinking what the fuck, but I decided to actually read the bill that classifies a MISTEMEANOR to state employees for failing to treat seniors like they should be treated in their home. I don't know why they wouldn't just fire their ass, but I've got no problem regulating state employees with state law. This is not really a freedom of speach issue as has been settled in Supreme Court ad nauseum https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201720180SB219 What, you meant 125 CSL posted something he knows nothing about with a BS title so he can talk shit about Cali? That's just hateful. :( Link to comment
Draker Posted August 18, 2017 Report Share Posted August 18, 2017 Awan Bro indicted on 4 charges.. and the wife which already fled the country is charged as well. Will they flip and turn on DWS? .... 1 Link to comment
Draker Posted August 18, 2017 Report Share Posted August 18, 2017 CNN reporting Barcelona terrorist might be copycat of Charlottesville... They have lost their fucking minds.. hahaha 4 Link to comment
paradime Posted August 18, 2017 Report Share Posted August 18, 2017 Awan Bro indicted on 4 charges.. and the wife which already fled the country is charged as well. Will they flip and turn on DWS? .... The complaint and affidavit against Awan accused him and his wife of attempting to commit bank fraud by misrepresenting themselves on a loan for a rental property they had and then wiring the proceeds to two unnamed persons in Pakistan. Fishy as fuck. 3 Link to comment
Draker Posted August 18, 2017 Report Share Posted August 18, 2017 The complaint and affidavit against Awan accused him and his wife of attempting to commit bank fraud by misrepresenting themselves on a loan for a rental property they had and then wiring the proceeds to two unnamed persons in Pakistan. Fishy as fuck. And kept on DWS payroll until the day he was arrested.. pulled in over 4 million bux for IT work.. 1 Link to comment
Recommended Posts