Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 28k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • KoHeartsGPA

    2561

  • datzenmike

    2330

  • Draker

    2054

  • a.d._510_n_ok

    2012

Top Posters In This Topic

Educate us where the bs and misinformation occured.

  

Why ? i didn't get anything out of it except the story giving us some history of those weapons.i know it's the NY Times,point out the BS.

I led the horses to water. Y’all are gonna have to drink for yourselves. I guarantee anyone with little more than rudimentary firearms knowledge already knows what I’m on about.

  • Like 1
Link to comment

I used to think gun control was the answer. My research told me otherwise.

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/i-used-to-think-gun-control-was-the-answer-my-research-told-me-otherwise/2017/10/03/d33edca6-a851-11e7-92d1-58c702d2d975_story.html?utm_term=.b68fd25ce66d

 

TL;DR

 

"Two-thirds of gun deaths in the United States every year are suicides."

 

"the next-largest set of gun deaths — 1 in 5 — were young men aged 15 to 34, killed in homicides. These men were most likely to die at the hands of other young men, often related to gang loyalties or other street violence. And the last notable group of similar deaths was the 1,700 women murdered per year, usually as the result of domestic violence."

Link to comment

Now pair those stats with the map posted above.. and see if you can draw any correlations. 

I think gun deaths can be categorized.A gang banger getting wacked is a lot different than shooting kids at school.I could care less about the gang banger as most would.He played in the wrong place and it cost him his life.Suicides shouldn't be counted,the dead one shot himself.I'm assuming this map is showing any death related to a gun ? 

  • Like 1
Link to comment

 

I led the horses to water. Y’all are gonna have to drink for yourselves. I guarantee anyone with little more than rudimentary firearms knowledge already knows what I’m on about.

...that's it? No more. I thought you were going to show us how to be enlightened.
  • Like 1
Link to comment

I think gun deaths can be categorized.A gang banger getting wacked is a lot different than shooting kids at school.I could care less about the gang banger as most would.He played in the wrong place and it cost him his life.Suicides shouldn't be counted,the dead one shot himself.I'm assuming this map is showing any death related to a gun ? 

 

Just murders

  • Like 1
Link to comment

ha-ha-haaa_o_253804.gif and all your finger in eye arguing about shit that ain't going to change. Talking about opinions.  "You make a good point, and I've changed my stance on gun control." said no one ever. You can pry my opinion from my cold dead hands.

  • Like 1
Link to comment

And, as we’ve come to expect from ny times, full of bullshit and misinformation.

 

 

You mean can?

 

Almost everything covered in it

Oh i think i got it now,the article used the term "assault rifle" when they should have just said  "gun"  Almost everything covered in it is just the history of those particular weapons,how they were created and what they were used for.How is that bullshit ? some of the stories told are not some writers fantasy.Maybe you can point out the BS zness.

Link to comment

ha-ha-haaa_o_253804.gif and all your finger in eye arguing about shit that ain't going to change. Talking about opinions.  "You make a good point, and I've changed my stance on gun control." said no one ever. You can pry my opinion from my cold dead hands.

100% fair.

  • Like 1
Link to comment

"Assault Rifle". defined by congress, defined by military, defined by media. Pick one and call all of the others bullshit. Gun expert internet presto.

 

Hey, Webster defines arms as an appendage with a hand at the end. Guess the 2nd amendment is actually about sleeveless shirts...

 

There is much to learn from those you disagree with.

  • Like 2
Link to comment

Soros doesn't live or have citizenship in the usa.. so yes it's pretty much exactly the same.

 

Global elections.. as in elections held on all parts of the planet. You know exactly what I meant.

 

No one here including myself said don't investigate. Please do.. but don't turn a blind eye because your pac is backed by soros.. or because your inlaw is a soros. Or because media matters or the open foundation tells you to do so.

 

The shoe has been on the other foot.. Media is liberal as fuck. Soros injects billions into elections. I feel the same way. we all do. But when the R word is mentioned all the sudden tiggering happens. Selective outrage happens in the media.. its pathetic.

 

The Russians goal is to divide, which is not hard to do. They are wasting their money. The only was we could be divided any further is by physically parting the usa. It's silly political theater.. on both sides.

 

Your statement is not threatening. but clearly proves you chose to ignore my sentament, or youve just missed the point.

 

From what I understand, Soros is a Hungarian Jew who was given US citizenship in 1961, made billions on Wall St, and spent 70% of it on global philanthropic causes and liberal political activism. The Koch brothers are also wealthy US citizens demonized for their philanthropy and political activism, but as far as I know, neither of them are an enemy combatant country with the second largest military on the planet. So I disagree, it's not even a little close to pretty much exactly the same. Do I want both Soros and the Koch brothers' slimy ass money out of US political system? I've answered that question way too many times already. Like it or not there are laws protecting their right to do what they're doing. 

 

Yes, I knew exactly what you meant by "global", that's why I posed the question I did. Guilty though, I just couldn't pass up a perfect setup for a jab.  :rolleyes:

 

Although I get where you're coming from, my response was to point out the polarity of your position. Like many wealthy people throughout our history, Soros is using his money to manipulate the system. Let me make this perfectly clear, I'm not going to condemn Sorass or the Koch kin for their political beliefs or using their wealth to promote it, what I HATE is that our country allows private $capital$ to run our system of government. As rich as he is though, I have a hard time believing Soros is the mastermind omnipotent overlord of the FBI investigation, even if the director's son has a Soros as an in-law. Trump's son in-law Jared Kushner failed to disclose his debts to Soros on his financial disclosure form, so what can we read into that?

 

Although I think you understood my statement, your response demands clarification. If the shoe was on the other foot, Hillary would be president right how and Democrats would be invalidating the FBI's investigation into a foreign government's influence in the election that put her there. No one is saying our MSM isn't political propaganda and far outweighed on the left, but lets be honest. If the shoe were on their other foot, Fox would be taring the Hillary administration all kinds of new assholes, and CNN would be calling the FBI corrupt, 80% Republican so therefore a biased deep state political attack machine, and everyone would be distracted from the fact that the heart of our democracy WAS ATTACKED. 

 

Whether or not Russians played a part in getting us here, this is where we're at. My point is, if we don't start questioning our own polarity, we are fucked.  Am I missing the point, or just not taking a side?

  • Like 1
Link to comment

I agree with pretty much everything you said. Well put. 

 

From what I understand, Soros is a Hungarian Jew who was given US citizenship in 1961, 

 

 

Credit where credit is due.. you are right on that one.. and so yes, not the same.

 

 

I agree with pretty much everything you said. Well put. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment

Oh i think i got it now,the article used the term "assault rifle" when they should have just said  "gun"  Almost everything covered in it is just the history of those particular weapons,how they were created and what they were used for.How is that bullshit ? some of the stories told are not some writers fantasy.Maybe you can point out the BS zness.

Propaganda , not calling you out tho

 

Obvious the article was written for every reason but information.. the title?

 

'honda civics evolved to enable illegal street racing '

 

Idk , it's annoying at first sight

Link to comment

Hearing McCabe altered 302s in Flynn investigation.

 

This is bad.. real bad.

 

And again why McCabe was fired by Wray. Reported as he stepped down.. Trump tweet as usual forecasted this.

 

No reports confirming the firing.. but we'll see. $1.8m pension on the line for him.

Link to comment
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.