Cuz Merica

[Dguy210]

Copied from elsewhere, sorry if a repost:

 

Timeline of the 2016 election:

 

The DNC rigs the Democratic Primary Election against Bernie Sanders so Hilliary can win the nomination.

 

Obama's administration starts to request surveillance on Trump, his family, his transition team, and anyone associated with him.

 

Donna Brazil gives Hilliary the questions to a debate.

 

The DNC pays Christopher Steele to come up with a smear dossier about Trump.

 

The mainstream media releases a taped conversation about Trump talking about grabbing women parts.

 

After all this Trump still wins the General Election. Obama orders an investigation into Russia meddling in our elections.

 

Obama changes Executive Order 12333 to allow more agencies to have access to surveillance data.

 

The Democratic Party comes up with a scandal that Trump Colluded with Russia to win the election with no evidence or proof. This wild claim is backed up by the mainstream media.

 

Obama hold overs start unmasking Trump's transition team and staff members then release the classified information to the mainstream media. Why?

 

Because the DNC and the Obama administration colluded with the intelligence community to thwart Trump's campaign efforts to get him elected president.

 

All this Russia collusion is an attempt to cover up the fact that the Obama administration, the intelligence community, the DNC, along with the mainstream media used our nations surveillance as a political tool to try to get Hilliary elected President. 

[Dguy210]

I couldn't find the Michael Jackson gif so I'll just lol.

[Draker]

So President Trump is now claiming Obama ordered wire taps on Trump Tower before the election.

 

Really????

 

 

These are some monumental claims.. I hope he has evidence to back them up. Cause a category 5 shitstorm has formed and doesn't appear to be weakening anytime soon.

 

 

Reminder, Trump was 11 months ahead on this news. 

[racerx]

Fake news

[datzenmike]

Once again trumps legacy (and to a large extent the media can't say they are not responsible either) is the fake news comment. Now even the truth can be dismissed with two words. The baby is thrown out with the bath water.

[Rjawm]

[Rjawm]

[Rjawm]

[VFR800]

99% of all of it is BULLSHIT spun to suit the agenda or audience of said network or outlet.

 

Real news - we all getting fucked over by a totally gamed system. 

[racerx]

Yep...what I been saying all along.

[racerx]

Oh yeh and if you speak up against Trumpcheeto u are quickly branded as a libtard, right john?

[VFR800]

Well he's literally not my POTUS and I am more of a centrist cause I see good points across all the political spectrum of views but do not am not a "joiner" so never support one "side" as that's too narrow a way to live.

[john510]

Oh yeh and if you speak up against Trumpcheeto u are quickly branded as a libtard, right john?

Since you brought it up.I don't think Trump is the one that should be "spoke against" right now,your side has shown to be quite corrupt and it seems to be unraveling a lot faster than Trump's supposed Russian collusion.Point fingers where they should be pointed.Sorry about the libtard status i've given you but when you can't just type "Trump" instead of "Trumpcheeto" i'll stick with my assessment of your political side.That side has a habit of name calling,attacking and denial of truth even when there are facts to show otherwise (maybe like Trump ? ).Let's hear your thoughts on this memo,something other than "fake news" please.

[john510]

Well he's literally not my POTUS and I am more of a centrist cause I see good points across all the political spectrum of views but do not am not a "joiner" so never support one "side" as that's too narrow a way to live.

This /\ 

[datzenmike]

In Canada the second largest party is called the opposition party or loyal opposition party and obviously the party in power today can easily become the opposition party of tomorrow. It's job is to (more or less) keep those in power in check. For every minister there is an opposition minister that asks the embarrassing questions of his counterpart. I've always identified with the opposition critic and never with those in power. If you identify with those in power you can easily become blind to their wrongs. As a loyal party member it's to your advantage (in politics) to 'toe the part line' no matter how wrong or corrupt your party is. As a critic you are free to ignore the rights and concentrate on a party's wrong doings or shortcomings and complain about them.

[racerx]

Since you brought it up.I don't think Trump is the one that should be "spoke against" right now,your side has shown to be quite corrupt and it seems to be unraveling a lot faster than Trump's supposed Russian collusion.Point fingers where they should be pointed.Sorry about the libtard status i've given you but when you can't just type "Trump" instead of "Trumpcheeto" i'll stick with my assessment of your political side.That side has a habit of name calling,attacking and denial of truth even when there are facts to show otherwise (maybe like Trump ? ).Let's hear your thoughts on this memo,something other than "fake news" please.

...ok john, looking at the finger again, not the moon, which side u think I honor? Heller john. None. Just because I call potus trumpcheeto? Really, yet oky for you to say I'm a library..wow I like the way you think cuz I can't stand that fake ass, make-up putting mega maniac, u brand too quickly.

[john510]

...ok john, looking at the finger again, not the moon, which side u think I honor? Heller john. None. Just because I call potus trumpcheeto? Really, yet oky for you to say I'm a library..wow I like the way you think cuz I can't stand that fake ass, make-up putting mega maniac, u brand too quickly.

Exactly what i expected for an answer.Some more name calling.Except for the "library" part ??? what about that memo ? does it not bother you ? you're still focused on the Trump hate.What is this finger and moon crap ?

[racerx]

Finger moon crap? I hope u understand but maybe not u r too closed minded. Library, that's auto correct. Meant to say you called people here, inc. Me libtard, yes? And not truly knowing what they value and cuz u are to quick to brand people who can't stand trumpcheeto as libtard. How's this, maybe these people you brand can't stand both sides of the house cuz they are corrupt to the core. Memo, my opinion, its a distraction.

[Dguy210]

[125 CSL]

Everyone,...well most already knew the info released in the memo. Just making it official at this level. Add in the tweeting FBI lovers and this becomes a big deal.

Now that it is all out and exposed at this level, will the JD change the investigation to focus on the real crimes.

 

 

 

the fbi is not owning up to what it has done

http://www.businessinsider.com/fbi-director-chris-wray-urges-message-to-employees-after-nunes-memo-2018-2

FBI director Chris Wray urges employees to 'keep calm and tackle hard' after Nunes memo's release

[john510]

Finger moon crap? I hope u understand but maybe not u r too closed minded. Library, that's auto correct. Meant to say you called people here, inc. Me libtard, yes? And not truly knowing what they value and cuz u are to quick to brand people who can't stand trumpcheeto as libtard. How's this, maybe these people you brand can't stand both sides of the house cuz they are corrupt to the core. Memo, my opinion, its a distraction.

You can't be using auto correct.Sorry.

[tr8er]

*"You're a library!"

[paradime]

 

Hillary paid foreign entities (including Russians) for "salacious and unverified" information about Trump - FACT

That salacious and unverified information was presented to a FISA court while intentionally omitting its source and funding - FACT

The surveillance warrant would not have been granted without the dossier, according to McCabe himself - FACT

Comey himself, under oath, admitted the dossier was "salacious and unverified" even though he signed the forms authorizing its use in obtaining a FISA warrant - FACT

It was concealed from the FISA court that the source of the Yahoo story used to "corroborate" the dossier was, in fact, the same compromised and fired Christopher Steele who wrote the dossier - FACT

Steele was working for Fusion GPS - FACT

 

Sure sounds like a "secret society within the FBI" trying to undermine an election and then later an elected president.  You know the FBI FISA WARRANT AGAINST A political candidate. 

This type of corruption should make you angry, no matter the party who is doing it. 

 

Also "Russia's known attempts to sway the 2016 election" you have a reliable source for that, you know one not made from "an anonymous source" but real facts? Because right now the PROVEN collusion for attempting to sway the 2016 election is Clinton with the Russians, so maybe you are referring to that as your source.

 

But of course if a person believe the means justifies the ends, then this corruption can be ignored as long as their preferred political candidate is elected. Which frankly disgusts me.

 

You don't have to support Trump to want to see these treasonous fucks hang.  The rule of law should prevail and apply equally to all.

 

 

 

Lets start by clearing this up once and for all, Hillary is not my hero, my choice for anything, or my party, and IMO her and the DNC should be fried for cock blocking Bernie. I'm utterly disgusted with democrats for impotently standing by their party after that crime. I FULLY support another investigation into anything the Clintons are accused of and pray that it sticks so we can finally crucify them and more on.

 

Earlier Dolomite said about liberals "The brainwashed will never admit their heroes had a hand in any wrongdoing." I called that a projection to point out the right has it's own brainwashed manufactured facts truth and reality. In fact the "FACTS" you posted about the FBI are bent all to hell to fit a bias pro Trump narrative. Let me demonstrate.

 

"Hillary paid foreign entities (including Russians) for "salacious and unverified" information about Trump" - Bent FACT

That salacious and unverified information was presented to a FISA court while intentionally omitting its source and funding" - Bent FACT

 

Your accusation intentionally omits the fact that the Steele dossier's original source and funding came from republicans as opposition research against Trump. 

 

"The surveillance warrant would not have been granted without the dossier, according to McCabe himself" - Not FACT

 

Fortunately McCabe's sealed testimony is a matter of public record thanks to the release of the Republican memo. And in FACT, it clearly states "McCabe testifies before the committee in December 2017 that no surveillance warrant would have been >sought< from the FBI without the Steele dossier information. 

 

"Comey himself, under oath, admitted the dossier was "salacious and unverified" even though he signed the forms authorizing its use in obtaining a FISA warrant" - Bent FACT

 

Once again, Comey's testimony is public record. Interesting to note you've referred to the Steele dossier as "salacious and unverified" three times like a WH talking point. Go back to the transcript of what Comey actually said when he testified and you’ll see he never claimed that the entire dossier was “unverified.” Comey did however say there was “salacious and unverified” material in reference to Trump’s alleged golden shower activities with Russian hookers. After the porn start thing I wouldn't put it passed him.

 

 

"It was concealed from the FISA court that the source of the Yahoo story used to "corroborate" the dossier was, in fact, the same compromised and fired Christopher Steele who wrote the dossier" - Bent FACT

"Steele was working for Fusion GPS" - The one and only FACT

 

Did you read the article you referenced? If you had you'd see the article was not “derived” from Steele. In fact it cites multiple sources reported that U.S. intelligence officials had briefed senior members of Congress on Page's activities in Russia. It quoted a senior U.S. law enforcement official, who confirmed that Page's Russian contacts were “on our radar screen for years” and “being looked at.”

 

Sure you can bend the shit out of the facts to make it look like the FBI is trying to undermine Trump by investigating Russia's alleged influence in the 2016 election. You can even conflate that into an intent to prove collusion and suggest it was Clinton who worked with the Russians. Liberals can do the same to make it look like Hillary was robbed of her rightful place in history and Trump orchestrated the whole thing, bla bla bla... 

 

Are you saying the entire United States Intelligence Community isn't a reliable source? All concluded with high confidence that the Russian government engaged in electoral interference during the 2016 U.S. presidential election. If that's not enough, how about these.

 

Joint Statement from the Department Of Homeland Security and Office of the Director of National Intelligence on Election Security, Oct. 7, 2016

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2016/10/07/joint-statement-department-homeland-security-and-office-director-national

 

U.S. Intelligence Community Assessment, Assessing Russian activities and intentions in recent U.S. elections, Jan. 6, 2017

https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf

 

U.S. House of Representatives Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence,

Russia Investigative Task Force Open Hearing with Social Media Companies, Nov. 1, 2017

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Russia+Investigative+Task+Force+Open+Hearing+with+Social+Media+Companies

 

U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Readout of Secretary Johnson's Call with State Election Officials on Cybersecurity, Aug. 15, 2017

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2016/08/15/readout-secretary-johnsons-call-state-election-officials-cybersecurity#

 

 

If you think I'm not pissed off about what's happened and is happening in my country you haven't been paying attention. It's plane to see who's so far up Trump's ass they'll believe anything he says. When he's caught in lies, and members of his campaign and cabinet are indicted they'll look the other way and side with a man of zero integrity. They support him attacking everyone investigating Russia's influence IN OUR DEMOCRACY because it's getting to close to him.

 

Is you're responce suggesting the FBI, an agency of 34,000 people and 80% republican is colluding to put Pence in office?  Lets dispense with the partisan bull shit when it comes to facts. I'm not looking to defend ANYONE and I'm sure as hell not taking sides in finding out what the fuck happened in 2016. FOR GOD SAKE MAN, I've repeated it a 1000 times here, none of the Left Right shit propaganda spewing out of the media is truth. 

 

You can be a Republican and still believe the rule of law should prevail and apply equally to all, including Trump.

 

But if you want to believe the entire DOJ is conducting a deep state coup d'etat to put Hillary in power, I can't argue with that logic.

[john510]

We have "fake news" and now "bent facts"  ? is it possible to bend facts ?

[240zness]

Hope that clears it up :)

 

Don't know if anyone has been saying we've been getting fucked all along..

 

To what extent is the question, and the acceleration. Truth is closer to the opposite of what we hear in the 'news'.

 

Real stuff just doesn't catch on, and not enough people take investigation far enough.