Cuz Merica

[angliagt]

 

If dreamers are deported, ‘it will be America’s loss and Mexico’s gain,’ Mexican foreign minister says

 

If the 600,000 Mexican-born recipients of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program – or DACA – are deported by the Trump administration, “America’s loss will be Mexico’s gain,” Mexican Secretary of Foreign Affairs Dr. Luis Videgaray Caso said Monday at a press conference in Sacramento.

 

Speaking at the Mexican Consulate in North Natomas, Videgaray called the recipients, also known as “Dreamers,” “a blessing.” He said if they are deported, the Mexican government is ready to help them continue their college educations, find jobs that fit their skills and provide them with medical insurance.

 

“We will receive them with.........

 

Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/news/local/article172765891.html#storylink=cpy

 

                           Well,let's try it,& see how it goes.

[tr8er]

Had an interesting 24, arguing with people over conspiracy theories. Amazing how many people think the towers going down was a demolition job secretly done in the middle of New York City. Without any actual proof of explosives residue, or structures cut to weaken so it would collapse.

There are certainly claims of verified explosive residue, as well as photographic evidence of thermite cut beams.  The evidence supporting demolition actually, in my opinion, outweigh the evidence that jet fuel could bring down the towers, and more importantly, that a fire could bring down building seven.  No skyrise before nor after this has come down as a result of fire.  Never.  And these buildings were built well.  Basically, I don't claim to know who or why.  But I will certainly not support the official story.  There is more to this one.  

[angliagt]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=333kJZQw0wY

 

              I'll bet that ticked off the other ten people who waited in that line.

[KoHeartsGPA]

 

You guys really need to use your head before posting shit. A published story is not validation. Check the facts. This was extremely easy to check up on. And no, you don't need to check every story you read, but it makes sense to check a story that you are going to share. Especially partisan issues that are likely to be skewed and often full of shit.

 

Oh really? You sure was sounding the Russians election interference to help Trump win horn, stop it with the hypocrisy!

[240zness]

My thoughts exactly. Oh no! It's below 80 we better set up shelter for the homeless so they don't die from the cold!

Ocean gets to 55° , so dtown concrete 40° dense cold sea air .

 

You know :)

[240zness]

There are certainly claims of verified explosive residue, as well as photographic evidence of thermite cut beams.  The evidence supporting demolition actually, in my opinion, outweigh the evidence that jet fuel could bring down the towers, and more importantly, that a fire could bring down building seven.  No skyrise before nor after this has come down as a result of fire.  Never.  And these buildings were built well.  Basically, I don't claim to know who or why.  But I will certainly not support the official story.  There is more to this one.

 

Just the begining of where we find everything now.

 

Like ko says follow the money, Hillary and co recently a great example. But not just left ;)

 

I backed into the 9-11 stuff from a diff angle of big deception , etc

 

One fact resonated way back , 2000 people skipped work at the towers that day.

 

God bless emergency crews and military

 

But so much shit thrown in our face

[a.d._510_n_ok]

It's like a Nirvana cover of "Dueling Banjos"

 

Seattle Mayor Ed Murray’s cousin: He sexually abused me, too

 

http://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/politics/mayor-ed-murrays-cousin-he-sexually-abused-me-too/

[KoHeartsGPA]

There are certainly claims of verified explosive residue, as well as photographic evidence of thermite cut beams. The evidence supporting demolition actually, in my opinion, outweigh the evidence that jet fuel could bring down the towers, and more importantly, that a fire could bring down building seven. No skyrise before nor after this has come down as a result of fire. Never. And these buildings were built well. Basically, I don't claim to know who or why. But I will certainly not support the official story. There is more to this one.

 

Wuuuut????

 

 

Here's a guy that tells people to come up with hard evidence of voter fraud so he'll believe it, now telling us to somehow believe that the towers came down as an inside job because he can't wrap his mind around the building coming down due to intense fire following a jet liner with full tanks of fuel hitting them at about 200mph....

 

 

WHAT THE FLYING FUCK!!!!!!

[Draker]

Building 7 though.. for real

[KoHeartsGPA]

Needed remodeling

[a.d._510_n_ok]

move along....nothing to see here.

 

[Jesse C.]

 

WTC 7 COLLAPSE

Claim: Seven hours after the two towers fell, the 47-story WTC 7 collapsed. According to 911review.org: "The video clearly shows that it was not a collapse subsequent to a fire, but rather a controlled demolition: amongst the Internet investigators, the jury is in on this one."

•  

Fire Storm: WTC 7 stands amid the rubble of the recently collapsed Twin Towers. Damaged by falling debris, the building then endures a fire that rages for hours. Experts say this combination, not a demolition-style implosion, led to the roofline "kink" that signals WTC 7's progressive collapse. (Photograph by New York Office of Emergency Management)

FACT: Many conspiracy theorists point to FEMA's preliminary report, which said there was relatively light damage to WTC 7 prior to its collapse. With the benefit of more time and resources, NIST researchers now support the working hypothesis that WTC 7 was far more compromised by falling debris than the FEMA report indicated. "The most important thing we found was that there was, in fact, physical damage to the south face of building 7," NIST's Sunder tells PM. "On about a third of the face to the center and to the bottom—approximately 10 stories—about 25 percent of the depth of the building was scooped out." NIST also discovered previously undocumented damage to WTC 7's upper stories and its southwest corner.

 

NIST investigators believe a combination of intense fire and severe structural damage contributed to the collapse, though assigning the exact proportion requires more research. But NIST's analysis suggests the fall of WTC 7 was an example of "progressive collapse," a process in which the failure of parts of a structure ultimately creates strains that cause the entire building to come down. Videos of the fall of WTC 7 show cracks, or "kinks," in the building's facade just before the two penthouses disappeared into the structure, one after the other. The entire building fell in on itself, with the slumping east side of the structure pulling down the west side in a diagonal collapse.

According to NIST, there was one primary reason for the building's failure: In an unusual design, the columns near the visible kinks were carrying exceptionally large loads, roughly 2000 sq. ft. of floor area for each floor. "What our preliminary analysis has shown is that if you take out just one column on one of the lower floors," Sunder notes, "it could cause a vertical progression of collapse so that the entire section comes down."

There are two other possible contributing factors still under investigation: First, trusses on the fifth and seventh floors were designed to transfer loads from one set of columns to another. With columns on the south face apparently damaged, high stresses would likely have been communicated to columns on the building's other faces, thereby exceeding their load-bearing capacities.

Second, a fifth-floor fire burned for up to 7 hours. "There was no firefighting in WTC 7," Sunder says. Investigators believe the fire was fed by tanks of diesel fuel that many tenants used to run emergency generators. Most tanks throughout the building were fairly small, but a generator on the fifth floor was connected to a large tank in the basement via a pressurized line. Says Sunder: "Our current working hypothesis is that this pressurized line was supplying fuel [to the fire] for a long period of time."

WTC 7 might have withstood the physical damage it received, or the fire that burned for hours, but those combined factors—along with the building's unusual construction—were enough to set off the chain-reaction collapse.

 

[a.d._510_n_ok]

[KoHeartsGPA]

Favorite???? It's disgusting!!! Like all their so called coffee!

[racerx]

I don't care if its the in thing, can't stand star bucks. Coffee is bitter. McDonald's coffee for a dollar and better tasting. Imo

[john510]

Wait... shelters for the San diego cold season? There is a cold season?!

Yes we have a cold season.I live in east county,one night it got down to 18 degrees.My King palms froze and all the branches snapped off.$800 bucks down the drain.That was a rare occurrence but we get severe frost often.

[tr8er]

Wuuuut????

 

 

Here's a guy that tells people to come up with hard evidence of voter fraud so he'll believe it, now telling us to somehow believe that the towers came down as an inside job because he can't wrap his mind around the building coming down due to intense fire following a jet liner with full tanks of fuel hitting them at about 200mph....

 

 

WHAT THE FLYING FUCK!!!!!!

Yup.  Straight up.  There is a ton of hard evidence pointing to controlled demolition.  Who coordinated it, and why are the questions I'd like answered.  I don't actually believe you believe a government report.  You.  Trusting a government report.  Explaining a skyrise building falling into it's own footprint that wasn't even hit.  The damage mentioned above would hugely support the gov. theory, but Ive seen no evidence of severe damage from the falling of the towers.  I've looked, but admittedly not recently.  The addition of special insurance specifically for planes flying into the buildings is a bit odd.  The requirement for asbestos removal costing more than the value of the buildings themselves gave incentive.  The images of patterned explosions indicate control.  The extremely high temperatures and molten steel in the rubble for weeks after the fire was out implicate thermite or similar.  

 

 http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/rubblefires.html

 

There is a link to all of the crazy theories and the less crazy ones.  Most with supporting evidence, some harder than others.  Almost all having more evidence than that article on busses of voters driven to new hampshire to vote.  That article showing absolutely no evidence of voter fraud, but merely speculating that the state laws would potentially allow such a thing to happen.  And since the majority of voters were voting against Trump, I suppose the implication was that this was an unfair advantage to Liberals.  It was a fluff piece article aimed at one thing, which is requiring voter ID's, yet gave no real evidence of a problem.  

 

Sorry KO.  I'll back up my statements.  I'd love to see you so the same some day, but I'm not holding my breath.  Maybe you can just go grab another liberal slur from the web and toss that into your next post?    

[tr8er]

I don't care if its the in thing, can't stand star bucks. Coffee is bitter. McDonald's coffee for a dollar and better tasting. Imo

Isn't McDonalds coffee, Starbucks Coffee?  

[john510]

Devil's advocate......let's say the government turns and you need the weapons that are banned in order to fight, the right to bare arms is not a regulation, it is for protection against possible tyranny that may occur. Just a thought and I know we discussed this issue here already, but the founding fathers left us safety nets in order to avoid being overun as it has happened in history many times, most recently Venezuela, a pistol won't help you much vs police tactical weaponry.

No matter what you have for weaponry it will not overpower anything the government has,you might get to kill something but you're not going to last long afterwards.The founding fathers were using black powder and were missing most of what they shot at.If they knew what technology would eventually bring us would they have written the constitution the same ? I've said it before that i think both sides of this gun argument issue are as crazy as the other.Its an issue that will never be resolved and make both sides happy.

[john510]

There are certainly claims of verified explosive residue, as well as photographic evidence of thermite cut beams.  The evidence supporting demolition actually, in my opinion, outweigh the evidence that jet fuel could bring down the towers, and more importantly, that a fire could bring down building seven.  No skyrise before nor after this has come down as a result of fire.  Never.  And these buildings were built well.  Basically, I don't claim to know who or why.  But I will certainly not support the official story.  There is more to this one.  

How many of those other skyrise fires involved a large object full of flammable material hitting them like a missile ? did you know there is photographic evidence of two airplanes flying into those buildings ?

[76Lil Hustler]

Isn't McDonalds coffee, Starbucks Coffee?  

No, McDonalds current coffee supply and sales system is actually specifically geared against starbucks. starbucks is just coffee flavored bullshit anyways. unless you get actual drip coffee there is the ratio of coffee to sugar remotely okay and doesn't feel like you turn into an instant diabetic.

not to mention halft he syrups they offer are soo carcinogenic they are illegal in CA  

[a.d._510_n_ok]

Pakistan: Man sentenced to death for farting in mosque during Ramadan

 

A Pakistani judge has sentenced a man to be executed after he was expelled 17 times from 6 different mosques for excessive farting during the period of the Ramadan reports the Islamabad Herald this week.

 

The Ramadan is the most important religious festival for Muslims and the judge declared that he had indisposed people of the faith and even caused 53 people at one time to leave the mosque during a prayer, a “blasphemous act” which should be punished “according to Allah’s will.”

 

The judge was lenient, have admitted many experts in the region, as he gave the convicted man the choice of being beheaded or stoned to death.

 

“The law is clear, he should be stoned to death, beheading is a very light sentence and saves him from any suffering,” protested the government prosecutor.

 

Muhammad Al-Wahabi, 33, suffers from chronic flatulence, “a rare medical condition” he argued in his self-defense, as no lawyer would take his case.

 

“No lawyer is crazy enough to bet his career on this issue. If his client his condemned, as in this case, the lawyer would face prosecution and possibly the same faith as his client” admits legal expert Andrew Jones, a Middle Eastern law expert.

 

Al-Wahabi did not contest the judgment and even said the judgment was fair and that he hoped Allah would be gracious enough to pardon his blasphemous actions.

 

Al-Wahabi also admitted that he put a tampon in his rectum several times in a desperate attempt to mask the noise and odor.

 

http://worldnewsdailyreport.com/pakistan-man-sentenced-to-death-for-farting-in-mosque-during-ramadan/

[datzenmike]

There are certainly claims of verified explosive residue, as well as photographic evidence of thermite cut beams.  The evidence supporting demolition actually, in my opinion, outweigh the evidence that jet fuel could bring down the towers, and more importantly, that a fire could bring down building seven.  No skyrise before nor after this has come down as a result of fire.  Never.  And these buildings were built well.  Basically, I don't claim to know who or why.  But I will certainly not support the official story.  There is more to this one.  

 

Let me get this right.... the twin towers were imploded with no thought that the FBI wouldn't investigate rigorously? and then just hours later, right under the world's noses, (because it must have been the most videoed, the most surveilled acreage on the planet.)....  they demolished #7 for good measure???????????????????? All this set to coincide with four jets to use as a cover? It's way too elaborate a hoax.

 

Molten metal? Seems to me that a lot, I mean A LOT of electricity would power that building. Ever arc weld? sure you have. You can do it with a car battery. Then there are probably things made of magnesium. Like on an air plane. 

 

Oh really? You sure was sounding the Russians election interference to help Trump win horn, stop it with the hypocrisy!

 

I think the argument was about busing in voters so unless the Russians rented the buses?

[KoHeartsGPA]

Yup. Straight up. There is a ton of hard evidence pointing to controlled demolition. Who coordinated it, and why are the questions I'd like answered. I don't actually believe you believe a government report. You. Trusting a government report. Explaining a skyrise building falling into it's own footprint that wasn't even hit. The damage mentioned above would hugely support the gov. theory, but Ive seen no evidence of severe damage from the falling of the towers. I've looked, but admittedly not recently. The addition of special insurance specifically for planes flying into the buildings is a bit odd. The requirement for asbestos removal costing more than the value of the buildings themselves gave incentive. The images of patterned explosions indicate control. The extremely high temperatures and molten steel in the rubble for weeks after the fire was out implicate thermite or similar.

 

http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/rubblefires.html

 

There is a link to all of the crazy theories and the less crazy ones. Most with supporting evidence, some harder than others. Almost all having more evidence than that article on busses of voters driven to new hampshire to vote. That article showing absolutely no evidence of voter fraud, but merely speculating that the state laws would potentially allow such a thing to happen. And since the majority of voters were voting against Trump, I suppose the implication was that this was an unfair advantage to Liberals. It was a fluff piece article aimed at one thing, which is requiring voter ID's, yet gave no real evidence of a problem.

 

Sorry KO. I'll back up my statements. I'd love to see you so the same some day, but I'm not holding my breath. Maybe you can just go grab another liberal slur from the web and toss that into your next post?

 

You must have failed physics class, I've seen countless of videos showing large fucking airliners hitting the towers, one you can even see debris flying out the other end of the building, do you have any idea of the damage done by the impact alone?, then you add the fire fed by jet fuel.....did you even look at how the building came down?, The floors that gave first are those of the impact, top floors weight caused the collapse downward, once it started gravity took over and the entire building collapsed, it's physics, SMH.

[Jesse C.]

This is what 9/11 Conspiracy nuts look like to me. Fucking nuts!