Jump to content

Cuz Merica

Ratwagon1600

By Ratwagon1600
in General Discussion

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 28k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • KoHeartsGPA

    2561

  • datzenmike

    2330

  • Draker

    2054

  • a.d._510_n_ok

    2012

Top Posters In This Topic

thisismatt Grand Master

thisismatt

Posted
Posted

 

Two things:

 

A.) I didn't know illegal arms dealers, burglars, or fellow gang members collected sales tax.  Learn something new every day.

B.) If a tax of $25/gun and 2-5¢/round of ammunition isn't an unacceptable hardship for law-abiding citizens in Seattle, then why is a $16 DMV issued ID card in Texas an unacceptable one for voting?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
KoHeartsGPA Newbie

KoHeartsGPA

Posted
Posted

Two things:

 

A.) I didn't know illegal arms dealers, burglars, or fellow gang members collected sales tax.  Learn something new every day.

B.) If a tax of $25/gun and 2-5¢/round of ammunition isn't an unacceptable hardship for law-abiding citizens in Seattle, then why is a $16 DMV issued ID card in Texas an unacceptable one for voting?

Libtard logic

Link to comment
paradime Veteran

paradime

Posted
Posted

From an amoral position you can't sin.

 

Subjectivist would say sin is in the eye of the beholder. 

 

Objectivist would say define sin and then prove it. 

 

Secularist would say your sins are your business

 

Ratunist would say where the fuck did the 10mm socket go?

Link to comment
tr8er Rookie

tr8er

Posted
Posted

Two things:

 

A.) I didn't know illegal arms dealers, burglars, or fellow gang members collected sales tax. Learn something new every day.

B.) If a tax of $25/gun and 2-5¢/round of ammunition isn't an unacceptable hardship for law-abiding citizens in Seattle, then why is a $16 DMV issued ID card in Texas an unacceptable one for voting?

Simply because the intention of the law was misstated. There are dear few souls who don't know what that law was really about. Partisan vote meddling is age old, and still despicable. You want to win elections, serve the people. Republicans want to limit the poor vote, democrats want to remove corporations from elections. It's understandable to want that from both sides. But to mask a law as protecting the integrity of voting procedures by requiring state issued ID's while still encouraging mail in ballots with no ID's is baseless. Especially given the actually voter fraud instances being Eugely overshadowed by the poor not voting due to no ID. My uncle was homeless for about 30 years. He was robbed almost weekly sleeping on the streets. What are the odds he would have an ID come vote day? He died two years ago having voted every vote since 18 years old. He campaigned the homeless community to get them to vote every year too. Every citizen has the right to vote unless a felon or under age. So the state can do what they need to ensure a fair election, but the Supreme Court saw through a dishonest law. And I think 99.9% of republicans know that.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
I'm BLUE Newbie

I'm BLUE

Posted
Posted

Missed a few.

 

>Trump will never get Paradime's trust or affection

>Trump will never know what it's like to be a minority in his America.

>Trump will never get Mexico to pay for his wall, but he will shut down our government to get us to pay for it.

>Trump will never drain the swamp because it's his natural habitat.

>Trump will never demonstrate his wicked Art of The Deal skills with the senate, congress, or his own party.

>Trump will never make good on his campaign promise to have Hillary locked up :(

>Trump will never have hands or an imaginary dick that are proportional to his megalodon ego.

>Trump will never be up front with his finances because he knows it would end his presidency.

>Trump will never stop Meuller's investigation into his finances.

 

The End

>Ratsun should needs to investigate paradimes account. The reply above is nearing grammatical perfection. I suspect fatazz NK dictator !!

 

Trololol

 

I kid i kid...... ;)

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Jesse C. Mentor

Jesse C.

Posted
Posted

Simply because the intention of the law was misstated. There are dear few souls who don't know what that law was really about. Partisan vote meddling is age old, and still despicable. You want to win elections, serve the people. Republicans want to limit the poor vote, democrats want to remove corporations from elections. It's understandable to want that from both sides. But to mask a law as protecting the integrity of voting procedures by requiring state issued ID's while still encouraging mail in ballots with no ID's is baseless. Especially given the actually voter fraud instances being Eugely overshadowed by the poor not voting due to no ID. My uncle was homeless for about 30 years. He was robbed almost weekly sleeping on the streets. What are the odds he would have an ID come vote day? He died two years ago having voted every vote since 18 years old. He campaigned the homeless community to get them to vote every year too. Every citizen has the right to vote unless a felon or under age. So the state can do what they need to ensure a fair election, but the Supreme Court saw through a dishonest law. And I think 99.9% of republicans know that.

 

Republicans, and some Democrats, just want you to be who you say you are and be legal to vote. It is not just about the poor and minorities, it is about voter fraud. Mail in ballots need to be better controlled, but since most of them are Democrat run, like California, they will hand them out like toilet paper. 

 

Funny how Democrats/Liberals are all for everybody voting, no matter who they are. Just give them freebies and bus them in and you have guaranteed votes. Sometimes even twice or more. Trust me, if someone can get a cel phone, they can get an I.D. The "I am a poor minority" excuse is lame and tired. 

 

Yes, there will be some hard cases, but they are small compared to the rest of the ones pulling off some fraud voting. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
a.d._510_n_ok Mentor

a.d._510_n_ok

Posted
Posted

Feinstein stuns San Francisco crowd: Trump 'can be a good president'

 

U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., stunned a San Francisco audience Tuesday when she said that if President Trump "can learn and change," he could “be a good president.”

 

The San Francisco Chronicle reported that Feinstein made the comments during a sold-out Herbst Theater interview. She was onstage with Ellen Tauscher, a former Bay Area congresswoman.

 

The paper described the event as a “political lovefest” — pointing out that Feinstein is wildly popular in San Francisco, where she served as mayor for a decade. She was first elected to the Senate in 1992, after a failed bid for governor of California.

 

Toward the end of the evening, Feinstein reportedly shocked the crowd when she declined to say that Trump should be impeached and then told the audience that they should be prepared to see Trump complete his four-year term.

 

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/08/30/feinstein-stuns-san-francisco-crowd-trump-can-be-good-president.html

  • Like 3
Link to comment
a.d._510_n_ok Mentor

a.d._510_n_ok

Posted
Posted

'nother prominent dem senator backs away from impeachment.

 

Claire McCaskill’s balancing act: How to be a moderate in immoderate times

 

“First of all, let me say,” McCaskill responded, her voice made tinny by the microphone, “I don’t think anybody in this room thinks you’re a racist. If you’re being stereotyped that way that’s just as unfair as stereotyping every black person as a terrorist for Black Lives Matter.”

 

The senator swayed on the stage, her long cardigan coat flowing behind her, as she made direct eye contact with Phillips through tortoiseshell glasses. “I can assure you,” she said, “there is stereotyping going on, on both sides.”

 

Since joining the Senate a decade ago, McCaskill has been known as one of its most quotably outspoken Democrats, but in her conversations with voters this day, she doggedly rode the median: People who deface statues should be prosecuted. Single-payer health care is a bad idea, and so is trying to impeach Trump, even if he had recently suggested that protesters standing with Nazis and white supremacists were “very fine people.”

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/claire-mccaskills-balancing-act-how-to-be-a-moderate-in-immoderate-times/2017/08/27/9e5dcc66-8814-11e7-a94f-3139abce39f5_story.html?utm_term=.eda38b607317

Link to comment
tr8er Rookie

tr8er

Posted
Posted

Republicans, and some Democrats, just want you to be who you say you are and be legal to vote. It is not just about the poor and minorities, it is about voter fraud. Mail in ballots need to be better controlled, but since most of them are Democrat run, like California, they will hand them out like toilet paper.

 

Funny how Democrats/Liberals are all for everybody voting, no matter who they are. Just give them freebies and bus them in and you have guaranteed votes. Sometimes even twice or more. Trust me, if someone can get a cel phone, they can get an I.D. The "I am a poor minority" excuse is lame and tired.

 

Yes, there will be some hard cases, but they are small compared to the rest of the ones pulling off some fraud voting.

The mail in vote is heavily favored by republicans. Show me any evidence that more fraud is taking place. Estimates of 3% of voters would be impacted by I'd laws., I think that is high, but even 1/2 of 1%?would far exceed fraudulent votes. Prove otherwise.

Link to comment
Jesse C. Mentor

Jesse C.

Posted
Posted

The mail in vote is heavily favored by republicans. Show me any evidence that more fraud is taking place. Estimates of 3% of voters would be impacted by I'd laws., I think that is high, but even 1/2 of 1%?would far exceed fraudulent votes. Prove otherwise.

 

It is not really possible to support fraud or the lack of it since not actual study or records investigation has been taken on a national level. But for some reason Democrats refuse to look into it and claim there is not fraud happening, when indeed there is. Most of my observation is based on what I have seen or read on the news. And the Left leaning news at that. 

 

The latest being a woman who is in jeopardy of being deported for voting illegally and another for voting multiple times. 

 

Let's wait for the committee looking into it comes out with its findings, although Schumer already wants it done away with. Why? Why not take a look and see what is really going on? Are the Democrats trying to suppress something? 

 

As for Voter I.D. Why not? We need an I.D. for almost everything else, why not to prove that we still hold that right to do so. As Citizen and a non Felon. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.

  I accept