Racer X 69 Posted April 15, 2017 Report Share Posted April 15, 2017 Rabbit Proof Fence is a damned good movie too. This is the fence that is in that movie. Link to comment
paradime Posted April 15, 2017 Report Share Posted April 15, 2017 Gives you a red white and blue boner to see all that missile power doesn't it. The chemical attack was trashy third rate media theater. Trumps multi million $ fireworks display accomplished only one thing, his approval rating went up 3 whole point. Those rockets sure as fuck didn't come out of Trumps pocket though. So what do you think, did he get his money's worth? Link to comment
datzenmike Posted April 15, 2017 Report Share Posted April 15, 2017 There's a new sheriff in town. Link to comment
thisismatt Posted April 15, 2017 Report Share Posted April 15, 2017 I was happy to see our joint tax return effective tax rate of 4.67%, buuuuut we maxed out two IRA's and I contribute to my 401(k). Now if only I could buy a house instead of pissing away nearly 50% of my income on rent. 4 Link to comment
paradime Posted April 15, 2017 Report Share Posted April 15, 2017 There's a new sheriff in town. That cartoon reality sharif put's on a great show don't he. Link to comment
KoHeartsGPA Posted April 15, 2017 Report Share Posted April 15, 2017 Need some tissues for those years? Link to comment
datzenmike Posted April 15, 2017 Report Share Posted April 15, 2017 Need some tissues for those ears? Ron Howard's ears? Link to comment
DanielC Posted April 15, 2017 Report Share Posted April 15, 2017 "There's a new sheriff in town." There is a sheriff in town. 1 Link to comment
john510 Posted April 15, 2017 Report Share Posted April 15, 2017 Gives you a red white and blue boner to see all that missile power doesn't it. The chemical attack was trashy third rate media theater. Trumps multi million $ fireworks display accomplished only one thing, his approval rating went up 3 whole point. Those rockets sure as fuck didn't come out of Trumps pocket though. So what do you think, did he get his money's worth? That wasn't Trump's fireworks display.That bomb was delivered to the Middle East while Barry O was in office.It was also authorized to be used before Trump was elected.You can't pin this on Trump,that ball was rolling before he got elected.Do you think we should try negotiating with ISIS ? Maybe invite them to participate in a peace treaty ? Link to comment
125 CSL Posted April 15, 2017 Report Share Posted April 15, 2017 http://www.atr.org/104-years-income-tax-then-and-now 1 Link to comment
paradime Posted April 15, 2017 Report Share Posted April 15, 2017 That wasn't Trump's fireworks display.That bomb was delivered to the Middle East while Barry O was in office.It was also authorized to be used before Trump was elected.You can't pin this on Trump,that ball was rolling before he got elected.Do you think we should try negotiating with ISIS ? Maybe invite them to participate in a peace treaty ? I clearly state what I'm referring to, and Trump's staged response to a staged chemical attack had nothing to do with fighting ISIS. It was supposedly to "Punish" Assad who is actually no the front line in that fight, not Trump. So if I think this missile attack was a farce it means I think we should negotiate with ISIS? Where the hell did that come from? Not even the liberals are saying stupid shit like that. Link to comment
datzenmike Posted April 15, 2017 Report Share Posted April 15, 2017 I clearly state what I'm referring to, and Trump's staged response to a staged chemical attack had nothing to do with fighting ISIS. It was supposedly to "Punish" Assad who is actually no the front line in that fight, not Trump. So if I think this missile attack was a farce it means I think we should negotiate with ISIS? Where the hell did that come from? Not even the liberals are saying stupid shit like that. Wow talk about adding 'facts' to fit the narrative. So who punished Assad???? Isis, Russia, US or other???? Fuck, GPA is even further ahead of you and is in denial that there even was a chemical attack. 1 Link to comment
john510 Posted April 15, 2017 Report Share Posted April 15, 2017 I clearly state what I'm referring to, and Trump's staged response to a staged chemical attack had nothing to do with fighting ISIS. It was supposedly to "Punish" Assad who is actually no the front line in that fight, not Trump. So if I think this missile attack was a farce it means I think we should negotiate with ISIS? Where the hell did that come from? Not even the liberals are saying stupid shit like that. Believe it or not everything is not a conspiracy.You seem to be convinced the most recent chemical weapons attack is fake news even though Assad has a long history of using them. Link to comment
Racer X 69 Posted April 15, 2017 Report Share Posted April 15, 2017 There's a new sheriff in town. 1 Link to comment
Jesse C. Posted April 15, 2017 Report Share Posted April 15, 2017 When the truth is too obvious, complicate it. Link to comment
datzenmike Posted April 15, 2017 Report Share Posted April 15, 2017 When the truth is too obvious, obfuscate it. 3 Link to comment
q-tip Posted April 15, 2017 Report Share Posted April 15, 2017 Boy, when we get home I'm gonna smack yoir momma straight in the mouth, caus there's no way you the fruit of my loins. 3 Link to comment
tr8er Posted April 15, 2017 Report Share Posted April 15, 2017 Believe it or not everything is not a conspiracy.You seem to be convinced the most recent chemical weapons attack is fake news even though Assad has a long history of using them. The facts implicating Assad are not there. Why would you think he did it? What would motivate that strike? Hmmm, let's see. I've got this big ass civil war going on. I've got a shit ton of militias coming at me and each other. Maybe I'll just kill a bunch of civilians. Yeah, brilliant idea. That'll serve my purposes. This chemical attack really made no sense for Assad. It did serve the purposes of anyone interested in entering the battle against Assad. This is really less crazy conspiracy, more just military strategy. 1 Link to comment
john510 Posted April 15, 2017 Report Share Posted April 15, 2017 The facts implicating Assad are not there. Why would you think he did it? What would motivate that strike? Hmmm, let's see. I've got this big ass civil war going on. I've got a shit ton of militias coming at me and each other. Maybe I'll just kill a bunch of civilians. Yeah, brilliant idea. That'll serve my purposes. This chemical attack really made no sense for Assad. It did serve the purposes of anyone interested in entering the battle against Assad. This is really less crazy conspiracy, more just military strategy. Yea ok,it's a worldwide conspiracy that even the United Nations is in on.Try checking the facts about Assad's history of using the chemical weapons.Or would that be part of the big conspiracy also ? why would anybody believe what Assad claims ? think about who he is and the way his country is. Link to comment
datzenmike Posted April 15, 2017 Report Share Posted April 15, 2017 The facts implicating Assad are not there. Why would you think he did it? What would motivate that strike? Hmmm, let's see. I've got this big ass civil war going on. I've got a shit ton of militias coming at me and each other. Maybe I'll just kill a bunch of civilians. Yeah, brilliant idea. That'll serve my purposes. This chemical attack really made no sense for Assad. It did serve the purposes of anyone interested in entering the battle against Assad. This is really less crazy conspiracy, more just military strategy. The US with all it's safeguards has fucked up in battle and killed civilians. It's called collateral damage and it's a fact of war. Now just how careful do you think the Assad regime is or if they even care? What about the alleged gas attacks when Obama was the POTUS???..... (crickets) What about Saddam and the Kurds? 1 Link to comment
tr8er Posted April 15, 2017 Report Share Posted April 15, 2017 I just don't get it. That's all. Granted the strategy of foreign leaders is well, foreign to me. But killing citizens for what reason? I just see more strategic reason for Russia to carry out the attack. Or one of the anti Assad forces. Framing is just more logical to me. And I haven't been presented any evidence to the contrary. I hope it's there. But if I see a hole dig in my back yard with a bone in it, and I have no evidence of who did it, I'd go with the most logical culprit and blame the dog. Unless evidence is presented implicating my cat, I would not likely blame her. Conspiracy theories are a bit more involved. I'm suggesting a logical conclusion. 1 Link to comment
Recommended Posts