Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 28k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • KoHeartsGPA

    2561

  • datzenmike

    2330

  • Draker

    2054

  • a.d._510_n_ok

    2012

Top Posters In This Topic

Gives you a red white and blue boner to see all that missile power doesn't it. The chemical attack was trashy third rate media theater. Trumps multi million $ fireworks display accomplished only one thing, his approval rating went up 3 whole point. Those rockets sure as fuck didn't come out of Trumps pocket though. So what do you think, did he get his money's worth? 

Link to comment

Gives you a red white and blue boner to see all that missile power doesn't it. The chemical attack was trashy third rate media theater. Trumps multi million $ fireworks display accomplished only one thing, his approval rating went up 3 whole point. Those rockets sure as fuck didn't come out of Trumps pocket though. So what do you think, did he get his money's worth? 

That wasn't Trump's fireworks display.That bomb was delivered to the Middle East while Barry O was in office.It was also authorized to be used before Trump was elected.You can't pin this on Trump,that ball was rolling before he got elected.Do you think we should try negotiating with ISIS ? Maybe invite them to participate in a peace treaty ?

Link to comment

That wasn't Trump's fireworks display.That bomb was delivered to the Middle East while Barry O was in office.It was also authorized to be used before Trump was elected.You can't pin this on Trump,that ball was rolling before he got elected.Do you think we should try negotiating with ISIS ? Maybe invite them to participate in a peace treaty ?

 

I clearly state what I'm referring to, and Trump's staged response to a staged chemical attack had nothing to do with fighting ISIS. It was supposedly to "Punish" Assad who is actually no the front line in that fight, not Trump. So if I think this missile attack was a farce it means I think we should negotiate with ISIS? Where the hell did that come from? Not even the liberals are saying stupid shit like that. 

Link to comment

I clearly state what I'm referring to, and Trump's staged response to a staged chemical attack had nothing to do with fighting ISIS. It was supposedly to "Punish" Assad who is actually no the front line in that fight, not Trump. So if I think this missile attack was a farce it means I think we should negotiate with ISIS? Where the hell did that come from? Not even the liberals are saying stupid shit like that. 

 

Wow talk about adding 'facts' to fit the narrative. So who punished Assad???? Isis, Russia, US or other???? Fuck, GPA is even further ahead of you and is in denial that there even was a chemical attack.

  • Like 1
Link to comment

I clearly state what I'm referring to, and Trump's staged response to a staged chemical attack had nothing to do with fighting ISIS. It was supposedly to "Punish" Assad who is actually no the front line in that fight, not Trump. So if I think this missile attack was a farce it means I think we should negotiate with ISIS? Where the hell did that come from? Not even the liberals are saying stupid shit like that. 

Believe it or not everything is not a conspiracy.You seem to be convinced the most recent chemical weapons attack is fake news even though Assad has a long history of using them.

Link to comment

Believe it or not everything is not a conspiracy.You seem to be convinced the most recent chemical weapons attack is fake news even though Assad has a long history of using them.

The facts implicating Assad are not there. Why would you think he did it? What would motivate that strike? Hmmm, let's see. I've got this big ass civil war going on. I've got a shit ton of militias coming at me and each other. Maybe I'll just kill a bunch of civilians. Yeah, brilliant idea. That'll serve my purposes.

 

This chemical attack really made no sense for Assad. It did serve the purposes of anyone interested in entering the battle against Assad. This is really less crazy conspiracy, more just military strategy.

  • Like 1
Link to comment

The facts implicating Assad are not there. Why would you think he did it? What would motivate that strike? Hmmm, let's see. I've got this big ass civil war going on. I've got a shit ton of militias coming at me and each other. Maybe I'll just kill a bunch of civilians. Yeah, brilliant idea. That'll serve my purposes.

 

This chemical attack really made no sense for Assad. It did serve the purposes of anyone interested in entering the battle against Assad. This is really less crazy conspiracy, more just military strategy.

Yea ok,it's a worldwide conspiracy that even the United Nations is in on.Try checking the facts about Assad's history of using the chemical weapons.Or would that be part of the big conspiracy also ? why would anybody believe what Assad claims ? think about who he is and the way his country is.

Link to comment

The facts implicating Assad are not there. Why would you think he did it? What would motivate that strike? Hmmm, let's see. I've got this big ass civil war going on. I've got a shit ton of militias coming at me and each other. Maybe I'll just kill a bunch of civilians. Yeah, brilliant idea. That'll serve my purposes.

 

This chemical attack really made no sense for Assad. It did serve the purposes of anyone interested in entering the battle against Assad. This is really less crazy conspiracy, more just military strategy.

 

 

The US with all it's safeguards has fucked up in battle and killed civilians. It's called collateral damage and it's a fact of war. Now just how careful do you think the Assad regime is or if they even care? What about the alleged gas attacks when Obama was the POTUS???..... (crickets) What about Saddam and the Kurds?

  • Like 1
Link to comment

I just don't get it. That's all. Granted the strategy of foreign leaders is well, foreign to me. But killing citizens for what reason? I just see more strategic reason for Russia to carry out the attack. Or one of the anti Assad forces. Framing is just more logical to me. And I haven't been presented any evidence to the contrary. I hope it's there. But if I see a hole dig in my back yard with a bone in it, and I have no evidence of who did it, I'd go with the most logical culprit and blame the dog. Unless evidence is presented implicating my cat, I would not likely blame her. Conspiracy theories are a bit more involved. I'm suggesting a logical conclusion.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.