Jump to content

Recommended Posts

 It's on a woman to not get knocked up if she doesn't want kids, birth control of all kinds work wonderfully. When did I shame women for having sex? 

 

 

 I just get tired of broads being fucking cumdumpsters just cause they have the fallback of ''getting it scraped''. I love them libs that decry violence and then perpetrate it themselves...a kid has a heartbeat before a missed period...ending that heartbeat amounts to a shameful action, hence(for those with reading comprehension skills) the shaming of those having abortions, not for getting their fuck on.

 

 

It's not on a woman to 'not get knocked up'. Ever hear of a condom??? You are unbelievable. If you think it's a woman's job to take care of birth control then that job would also include taking care of an unwanted pregnancy too. When you shift the responsibility over to her, you have no further say after this.

 

Shame them??? well not for having sex..... You called most women that have abortions sluts, now you say broads, and cum dumpsters in the same sentence. Some woman must have really fucked you up.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
  • Replies 28k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • KoHeartsGPA

    2561

  • datzenmike

    2330

  • Draker

    2054

  • a.d._510_n_ok

    2012

Top Posters In This Topic

It's not on a woman to 'not get knocked up'. Ever hear of a condom??? You are unbelievable. If you think it's a woman's job to take care of birth control then that job would also include taking care of an unwanted pregnancy too. When you shift the responsibility over to her, you have no further say after this.

 

Shame them??? well not for having sex..... You called most women that have abortions sluts, now you say broads, and cum dumpsters in the same sentence. Some woman must have really fucked you up.

I like to call that hypocrisy.

Link to comment

Really??? you're going to throw F bombs without even knowing WTF you're talking about???......see, THAT is exactly what happens when your source for information is CNN.....I take it they didn't show the wack jobs wearing hats that resembled vaginas.....sad :no:

Really GPA??? Did I hurt your feelings with my bad words? I'm sorry. I don't watch TV's cartoon version of the news because they focus on pussy shaped hats instead of what's going on in the world. Obviously you're far better informed than me when it comes to that stuff. So you're right, I have no idea what the F bomb you're talking about. It's sad that you think I should know that. Really sad   :no:

Link to comment

It's not on a woman to 'not get knocked up'. Ever hear of a condom??? You are unbelievable. If you think it's a woman's job to take care of birth control then that job would also include taking care of an unwanted pregnancy too. When you shift the responsibility over to her, you have no further say after this.

 

Shame them??? well not for having sex..... You called most women that have abortions sluts, now you say broads, and cum dumpsters in the same sentence. Some woman must have really fucked you up.

It goes both ways, it is scientifically proven that when a man is aroused he is more likely to make poor decisions. However that is is completely false for a woman. So in that particular situation the woman is more in control of herself than the man is therefore it is her responsibility just as much as the man's to NOT get pregnant.

 

 

SCIENCE!

  • Like 1
Link to comment

Back to Zuckenberg and the lawsuit.....WTF, I read an article that stated the reason why he filed a lawsuit was to get in touch with people who owns parcel of land by his. Not a good way to have a smooth transition. Why couldn't he put out an ad in the Hawaiian newspaper or have some kind of Town Hall meeting about his plans prior to the suit.

.

So. As I understand it. The way property was distributed/awarded after the overthrow left property in the hands of bloodlines. This makes ownership of parcels both multi-generational, as well as spread out amongst a ton of people. Some of which don't even know they own it. The zuc side is that the lawsuit was needed to find out who the owners even are. Additionally, it gives Zuc the ability to buy land when all of the owners have not been directly contacted. Assuming enough effort was put in. Legally speaking. I don't know how true this is, but I'll confirm the muddy ownership but. There is plenty of that.

Link to comment

Really GPA??? Did I hurt your feelings with my bad words? I'm sorry. I don't watch TV's cartoon version of the news because they focus on pussy shaped hats instead of what's going on in the world. Obviously you're far better informed than me when it comes to that stuff. So you're right, I have no idea what the F bomb you're talking about. It's sad that you think I should know that. Really sad   :no:

Awww, you're butthurt again....go find a crying room to help you, Berkeley has some at the Uni :hug:

  • Like 1
Link to comment

It's not on a woman to 'not get knocked up'. Ever hear of a condom??? You are unbelievable. If you think it's a woman's job to take care of birth control then that job would also include taking care of an unwanted pregnancy too. When you shift the responsibility over to her, you have no further say after this.

 

Shame them??? well not for having sex..... You called most women that have abortions sluts, now you say broads, and cum dumpsters in the same sentence. Some woman must have really fucked you up.

 

thats neo-liberal

 

two totally different things

  • Like 1
Link to comment

It's not on a woman to 'not get knocked up'. Ever hear of a condom??? You are unbelievable. If you think it's a woman's job to take care of birth control then that job would also include taking care of an unwanted pregnancy too. When you shift the responsibility over to her, you have no further say after this.

 

Shame them??? well not for having sex..... You called most women that have abortions sluts, now you say broads, and cum dumpsters in the same sentence. Some woman must have really fucked you up.

  

 

Kinda funny you act like I'm talking first person here. So, if I go out and fuck everything with a heartbeat and get some chick pregnant, I can't make her get an abortion if I don't want the kid...erfuckinggo, taking care of the unwanted pregnancy is already on her Mr straw man. I have no problem with women, I respect and adore them. I do, however have huge issues with childish, responsibility shirking, me first, dick-warmer bitches. They aren't women, they're children in adults bodies. Just like those child support dodging, not taking care of their kid motherfuckers aren't men. Look a little deeper, you'll see my problem is with buck passing, irresponsible, whores of either sex...one of my parents was one. It taught me better than anything else could, don't shoot a load into anyone you don't want to have a kid with. Birth control is on whomever doesn't want a kid. If a chick wants to be promiscuous, cool, but she better be safe.

 

 

 

I like to call that hypocrisy.

I'm honestly not following you.

  • Like 3
Link to comment

  

 

Kinda funny you act like I'm talking first person here. So, if I go out and fuck everything with a heartbeat and get some chick pregnant, I can't make her get an abortion if I don't want the kid...erfuckinggo, taking care of the unwanted pregnancy is already on her Mr straw man. I have no problem with women, I respect and adore them. I do, however have huge issues with childish, responsibility shirking, me first, dick-warmer bitches. They aren't women, they're children in adults bodies. Just like those child support dodging, not taking care of their kid motherfuckers aren't men. Look a little deeper, you'll see my problem is with buck passing, irresponsible, whores of either sex...one of my parents was one. It taught me better than anything else could, don't shoot a load into anyone you don't want to have a kid with. Birth control is on whomever doesn't want a kid. If a chick wants to be promiscuous, cool, but she better be safe.

 

 

 

 

I'm honestly not following you.

 

Well, at least you said 'chick'. :thumbup:

  • Like 3
Link to comment

This oughta light the fuse on some unhinged bitches' collective tampons!

 

Canada to Mexico on NAFTA: you might be on your own

 

Canada will focus on preserving its U.S. trade ties during talks to renegotiate NAFTA and may not be able to help Mexico avoid being targeted by the Trump administration, Canadian government sources say.

 

"We love our Mexican friends. But our national interests come first and the friendship comes second," a source said on the sidelines of a cabinet retreat in Calgary, Alberta.

 

"The two are not mutually exclusive," the source added.

 

The comments are some of the starkest yet by Canadian officials, who are increasingly convinced Mexico will suffer the most damage from changes to the North American Free Trade Agreement.

 

U.S. President Donald Trump on Sunday said he planned talks.......

 

http://mobile.reuters.com/article/ousivMolt/idUSKBN1582MV

  • Like 1
Link to comment

When your neighbors property goes to shit, your property value suffers. Always. It's likely I wouldn't agree with NAFTA either. Haven't studied this agreement enough to take position. But we should be concerned about anything likely to hurt Mexico.

 

What would a NAFTA reversal do to Mexico? Anyone got trade rates?/regulation data?

Link to comment

When your neighbors property goes to shit, your property value suffers. Always. It's likely I wouldn't agree with NAFTA either. Haven't studied this agreement enough to take position. But we should be concerned about anything likely to hurt Mexico.

What would a NAFTA reversal do to Mexico? Anyone got trade rates?/regulation data?

I don't think anyone has hard real numbers, all stats from my searches :(

Link to comment

Transmit energy horizontally to other states with abundant solar and wind resource? Or are you proposing a wall between California and the US? Transmission north is all that makes sense.

You're totally right except for the part where you're completely wrong. Southern California is always in need of power, especially during the summer months where they call for flex your power days more frequently than Hillary Clinton feeds on the blood of innocence. It's a great idea.

  • Like 2
Link to comment

You're totally right except for the part where you're completely wrong. Southern California is always in need of power, especially during the summer months where they call for flex your power days more frequently than Hillary Clinton feeds on the blood of innocence. It's a great idea.

Wrong? As stated, all states that border Texas have great renewable resources. As in, why the fuck would you build a wind or solar farm in Texas, to power California, instead of building the same thing IN California bypassing the most expensive transmission wall in history, while taking advantage of California's awesome renewable energy tax credits as well as getting paid more per kWh produced by avoiding taxes and transmission fees. Wind farms, same exact story.

Link to comment
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.